Pass the ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions and answers with CertsForce

McCaghy's Perspective on Organizational Deviance:Criminologist Charles McCaghy identified regulatory pressure as a significant factor influencing organizational deviance. Excessive or poorly implemented regulations can lead companies to cut corners or engage in fraudulent behavior to remain competitive.

Supporting Analysis:

Regulatory pressure can create a perception that compliance is too costly or burdensome, leading to unethical practices.

This aligns with the concept of "strain theory," where organizations under pressure may resort to deviance.

Conclusion:McCaghy's assertion that regulatory pressure is a key driver of organizational deviance is accurate.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Government auditors typically cannot unilaterally withdraw from an audit engagement, even in cases where fraud is identified. Public-sector audits often follow mandates from higher authorities or statutes that require the auditor to continue and report findings to oversight bodies. Additionally, fraud and abuse (including misconduct and misuse of assets) are relevant to government audits under ISSAIs, contrary to A and B. Option D is incorrect because public-sector audit objectives are often broader, encompassing compliance, performance, and integrity aspects.

Impact of Specialized Departments on Fraud Risk:While specialization improves operational efficiency, it can also create silos, reducing oversight and coordination. This fragmentation may increase the overall fraud risk.

Key Considerations:

Fraud often occurs in areas where controls and communication are weak. Specialized departments may inadvertently facilitate fraud by isolating information.

Cross-departmental collaboration and centralized controls are essential to mitigate these risks.

Conclusion:The existence of many specialized departments increases the risk of fraud if not properly managed.

 ACFE Code of Professional Ethics:

The ACFE Code of Ethics prohibits fraud examiners from making absolute statements about the absence of fraud. Fraud cannot be definitively ruled out based on an examination's findings.

 Why B is Correct:

Stevens cannot state that the organization is "free of fraud," as fraud detection is inherently limited by the scope and methods of the examination. Such a statement could mislead stakeholders and compromise ethical standards​​.

Risks Associated with Specialized Departments:

While specialization improves efficiency, it can create silos that hinder communication, coordination, and oversight, increasing fraud risk.

Isolated departments may lack cross-functional checks and balances.

Conclusion:Specialized departments often increase fraud risk if not managed with proper controls and oversight.

Behaviorist Theories on Reinforcement:

Positive reinforcement is the most effective way to encourage desired behavior by providing rewards for compliance.

Analysis of Options:

B. Public criticism:May create resentment and decrease morale.

C. Loss of paid time off:A punitive measure that may not motivate improvement.

D. Demotion:Effective for extreme cases but harsh and potentially counterproductive for minor errors.

Conclusion:Offering a bonus for perfect reconciliation aligns with behaviorist principles of positive reinforcement.

Findings from the 2020 Report to the Nations:

Tips are the most common method of detecting fraud, accounting for over 40% of detected cases.

Whistleblower hotlines and other reporting mechanisms are vital for obtaining tips.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Internal audit:While effective, it is less common than tips.

B. Confession:Rarely the initial method of detection.

D. External audit:Detects fraud in a smaller percentage of cases.

Conclusion:Tips are the most common method of fraud detection according to the 2020 Report to the Nations.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

External fraud risk refers to schemes involving individuals or entities outside of the organization. Collusion between contractors is a prime example, as both parties are external vendors or service providers working together to defraud the organization. The other choices (A, B, D) involve internal actors and fall under occupational or financial reporting fraud.