Pass the Relativity Relativity Admin RCA Questions and answers with CertsForce

The correct answer is C. Files must be generated using the RSMF specifications before they are imported into Relativity. Relativity’s official Short Message Format documentation explains that to use the Short Message Viewer, you first need to create an RSMF file, and the example/specification pages describe the required structure and header information that must be present before ingestion using Processing. Relativity also states that Processing is the recommended method of importing RSMF files into Relativity, which means the RSMF file already exists when Processing begins.

This rules out the other options. Relativity does not say that it automatically creates RSMF on-the-fly for all non-document data. It also does not describe a processing-profile feature that converts arbitrary XML from chat platforms into RSMF during import. Nor is there a document-list mass operation that converts conversations into RSMF. Instead, RSMF is a defined external format that must be constructed according to Relativity’s published specifications, then imported and processed to preserve message metadata, attachments, and near-native review behavior. Therefore, the correct answer is C.

The correct answer is B. :Name: . Relativity’s RSMF-supported emoji documentation states that emojis in RSMF files display as text strings surrounded by colons , giving the example :smile: . That directly establishes the emoji short-name format used by Relativity for named emoji representations.

The Short Message Viewer documentation also confirms that users can search for emojis in conversations. Since Relativity’s own emoji naming convention is colon-delimited short names, the correct format for searching by name is :Name:. The other options use bracket, angle-bracket, or quoted forms that Relativity does not identify as the short-name syntax for emoji. Therefore, the correct answer is :Name: .

The correct answer is D. Check the box to export multiple-choice fields as nested. Relativity’s official export documentation states that Export Multiple Choice Fields as Nested is the option used to maintain the hierarchy of Relativity multiple-choice lists during export. It further explains that the nested value delimiter is a backslash, which preserves the parent-child structure of those choices in the exported data.

This means the hierarchy is not lost by default if the appropriate export option is selected, so option A is incorrect. Sorting on the field does not preserve the nested hierarchy, making option B wrong. Exporting as CSV for Excel recognition is also not the documented mechanism, so option C is incorrect. From an RCA and data loading standpoint, this setting matters because exported hierarchical values often need to be re-used downstream, re-imported, or validated in a way that preserves their original structure. Without the nested export option, the relationship between parent and child values may not be represented correctly. Therefore, the proper way to maintain multiple-choice hierarchy when exporting a saved search through Import/Export is to check the box to export multiple-choice fields as nested .

The correct answer is A. Mass Image and Document Local Access. Relativity’s official Mass Delete permissions page lists the required rights to successfully mass delete documents. In addition to the Mass Delete permission itself under mass operations, the user must have several document-related permissions, including Delete , Edit , Image , and object-security rights such as Add Image and Delete Image on the Document object. In exam-style shorthand, this corresponds to having image-related deletion capability and document-level access beyond the Mass Delete toggle alone.

The other combinations do not match the documented permission model. Mass Convert is unrelated to deletion. Mass Edit alone does not satisfy the image/file handling aspects of document deletion. The question’s wording is a little compressed compared with the full Relativity permissions matrix, but among the answer choices, the only one that aligns with the need for image-related rights plus document-level access is Mass Image and Document Local Access . In practical administration, mass deleting documents can also involve deleting associated images and natives from storage, so Relativity requires more than a single Mass Delete checkbox. That is why administrators must ensure the deleting group has the necessary image and document permissions in addition to Mass Delete. Therefore, the best answer from the provided options is A .

The correct answer is D. Remove key terms from the dtSearch index noise words. Relativity’s dtSearch documentation explains that if a word in the search phrase is part of the noise words list, and that word is important to the search, you must remove it from the dtSearch noise words list and then rebuild the index. The documentation gives this exact type of guidance for terms like “and” when the term must be treated as part of the actual phrase instead of being ignored.

This makes options B and C incorrect because changing or deleting the attorney’s search terms would alter the intended search logic rather than making the index capable of respecting the requested phrase. Option A is also incorrect because the alphabet file is for searchable characters and tokenization behavior, not for managing ignored noise words. Therefore, before running the Search Terms Report, the correct step is to remove those key terms from the dtSearch index noise words list and rebuild the index if needed.

The correct answer is B. Turn on Date Recognition before building the dtSearch index. Relativity’s Searching Guide explains that date recognition must be activated before it can be used in the workspace. It also states that dtSearch recognizes valid date formats common in both the US and UK , including DD/MM/YY and DD/MM/YYYY formats. That means UK dates are supported, but the index must be configured with Date Recognition enabled in order to take advantage of date searching behavior.

This rules out option D because UK date formats are explicitly supported. Option C is incorrect because adding the slash character to the alphabet file is not the documented preparation step for date searching. Option A is unrelated to dtSearch date-recognition configuration. From an RCA perspective, the important point is that dtSearch can recognize UK-style numeric dates, but only if Date Recognition is enabled before the relevant index build. Therefore, the correct answer is B .

The correct answer is D. Building a search terms report. Relativity’s Search Terms Report documentation requires you to define report information including a Searchable Set, which is a saved search containing the documents to be evaluated by the STR. Relativity’s guidance for using STRs also states that you should define a saved search that returns the required document population for the searchable set. That makes a saved search a required component of building a search terms report.

The other options do not inherently require a saved search. A keyword search can be run directly in the search panel. A dashboard can be created without requiring a saved search as its core prerequisite. A persistent highlight set is commonly used with STR output, but the question asks which action itself requires a saved search, and the STR workflow is the one explicitly documented to require one. Therefore, the correct answer is Building a search terms report.

The correct answer is C. The blank values will replace the existing field values. Relativity’s Import/Export document load file import documentation states that for Append/Overlay and Overlay Only , if a blank metadata field exists in the load file, the blank value will overlay remove any existing value in the corresponding mapped field. That means the blank value does not preserve the original value; it clears it.

This rules out the other options. The import does not preserve the old value in the mapped field, so option A is incorrect. The workflow does not error merely because blank values are present, so option B is also incorrect. Option D is wrong because the behavior is not limited to fixed-length text fields; it is described generally for mapped metadata fields in overlay mode. Therefore, the correct answer is that blank values replace existing field values during overlay import.

The correct answer is A. Ignore Numbers. Relativity’s near duplicate documentation explains that when Ignore Numbers is set to true, the similarity calculation considers only tokens beginning with letters, which means numbers are excluded from the similarity percentage calculation. That is directly relevant for invoice populations, because many invoices share nearly identical wording while differing mainly by dates, invoice numbers, quantities, or amounts. In a set like the one described, toggling Ignore Numbers is the setting most likely to change how those documents are grouped and help you assess whether the current near duplicate results can be improved.

The other options do not fit this use case. MD5Hash Verifier is related to hash-based duplicate validation rather than textual near duplicate tuning. Relativity Compare is a review tool for examining differences after grouping, not a setting that changes how the grouping is calculated. Auto-recognize Dates is not the structured analytics tuning option documented for this scenario. Therefore, for invoice-heavy data where numerical differences are driving questionable textual near duplicate results, the correct setting to toggle is Ignore Numbers.

The correct answer is A. Document - Update . Relativity’s official Audit documentation states that system admins can revert coding decisions from the Audit list, and that this action applies to the latest Document Update , Mass Update , or Propagate action on the Document object. That makes Document - Update the correct revertable action among the choices provided.

The other options are not listed by Relativity as revertable audit actions in this context. A Field - Update concerns the field object itself rather than a document coding decision. Entity - Merge may create audit records, but Relativity does not list it as an action that can be reverted through the Audit revert feature. Redaction - Update is also not one of the documented revertable audit actions under the Audit tab’s revert capability. From an RCA perspective, this distinction matters because Audit revert is narrowly scoped to specific document-level update actions and certain supported field types. Therefore, the correct answer is Document - Update .