Pass the NCC C-EFM EFM Questions and answers with CertsForce

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract NCC-Recommended Sources

Sentinel events are defined by the Joint Commission as unexpected occurrences involving death, serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof, and they require immediate investigation, root-cause analysis, and institutional response. They do not require confirmed malpractice or negligence.

AWHONN’s perinatal safety guidelines and NCC’s Professional Issues domain specify that sentinel events trigger mandatory reporting, analysis, system review, and corrective action plans. Simpson & Creehan emphasize that they are addressed through standardized safety processes, including interdisciplinary review.

Miller’s Pocket Guide notes that sentinel events are “events that require immediate investigation to prevent recurrence,” aligning with answer choice B.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

NCC and AWHONN auscultation standards emphasize the need to document FHR findings relative to uterine contractions, including:

The FHR between contractions (baseline)

FHR during contractions

Presence/absence of decelerations

Recovery after a contraction

Uterine activity determines whether findings are:

Baseline

Accelerations

Early/late/variable decelerations

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Fetal position — relevant for Doppler placement, not auscultation documentation.

B. Stage of labor — affects monitoring frequency but does not change how findings are documented.

Correct answer: C. Uterine activity.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract Without Links:

According to the NCC C-EFM Content Outline and AWHONN Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles, recurrent decelerations are specifically defined as decelerations that occur with ≥50% of uterine contractions in a 20–30-minute window, but standardized interpretation guidelines used by NCC and ACOG categorize recurrent patterns based on any 30-minute evaluation period.

AWHONN (FHM 6th Ed.) explains that fetal heart patterns must be evaluated over “a sufficiently long segment, typically 30 minutes, to determine whether the pattern is intermittent or recurrent.”

Menihan & Simpson further emphasize that recurrent decelerations imply a persistent physiologic stressor, requiring systematic evaluation and intrauterine resuscitation. NCC's Candidate Guide ties this rule directly into categorization within Category II and III tracings. Therefore, 30 minutes is the correct standard evaluation interval for determining recurrence.

====================================================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

An early deceleration is defined by NICHD and NCC as a gradual decrease and return of the fetal heart rate associated with uterine contractions. NCC emphasizes that early decelerations are:

Symmetrical

Uniform in shape

Mirror images of the contraction

This means:

Onset of deceleration = onset of contraction

Nadir of deceleration = peak of contraction

Recovery = end of contraction

Duration of the deceleration ≈ duration of the contraction

Thus, the correct answer is C. The same.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract–Based NCC C-EFM References:

NCC physiology content specifically includes maternal autoimmune influences on fetal cardiac conduction. Conditions such as maternal lupus (SLE) or Sjogren’s syndrome may produce anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies. These antibodies cross the placenta and damage fetal conduction tissue.

The primary site of injury is the fetal atrioventricular (AV) node, leading to:

First-, second-, or complete third-degree heart block

A slow, regular ventricular rate typically 50–70 bpm

Loss of beat-to-beat variability because ventricular myocardium does not display normal autonomic modulation

This mechanism is extensively described in AWHONN, NCC physiology materials, and maternal–fetal physiology texts.

Option A: Antibodies do not target fetal RBCs; that describes hemolytic disease of the newborn.

Option B: Targeting maternal WBCs is not fetal-specific.

The correct affected structure is the fetal AV node.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. The fetal atrioventricular node.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Both fetal tracings (A and B) show:

Baselines around 140–150 bpm

Moderate variability

Intermittent accelerations

No recurrent decelerations

Normal contraction pattern

Overall Category I patterns for both twins

NCC, NICHD, and AWHONN emphasize that moderate variability with a normal baseline is the strongest reassurance of fetal well-being, even in multifetal gestations.

There is no evidence of:

Tachysystole

Recurrent variables

Recurrent lates

Prolonged decelerations

Category III patterns

Therefore, the appropriate action is ongoing observation.

Why the incorrect answers are wrong:

A. Cesarean birth — Not indicated with Category I FHR patterns.

C. Terbutaline — Reserved for tachysystole or prolonged deceleration patterns, not present here.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Normal umbilical arterial values per NCC/AWHONN/Menihan:

pH: 7.20–7.30

PaCO₂: 45–55 mmHg

HCO₃: 20–24 mEq/L

Base deficit: 0 to –5 (normal to mild respiratory changes)

This sample shows:

pH 7.25 → normal

Base deficit –4 → no metabolic acidosis

HCO₃ normal

Slightly elevated PaCO₂, consistent with mild respiratory influence but still normal

PaO₂ 20 mmHg is normal for cord arterial blood

This profile is not acidotic (acidosis requires pH <7.10 and base deficit ≥12).

It also does not indicate hypoxia, which would present with metabolic acidosis.

Therefore: Normal.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (NCC C-EFM sources: AWHONN, Miller’s Pocket Guide, Menihan, Simpson, Creasy & Resnik, 2025 Candidate Guide)

The tracing displays baseline fetal bradycardia, with a rate near 100 bpm, minimal variability, and preserved periodic response. According to AWHONN’s Fetal Heart Monitoring Principles & Practices and Menihan’s Electronic Fetal Monitoring, maternal conditions that reduce oxygen-carrying capacity—including maternal anemia—can lead to lower fetal oxygen delivery, prompting a fetal compensatory bradycardic baseline.

Creasy & Resnik’s Maternal-Fetal Medicine notes that sickle cell anemia decreases maternal hemoglobin function even when maternal vital signs appear stable, reducing uteroplacental oxygen transport. Fetuses of mothers with sickling disorders may demonstrate lower resting fetal heart rates due to chronic mild hypoxemia.

Conversely, Eisenmenger’s syndrome is associated with severe maternal cyanosis and high fetal mortality, often producing late decelerations and growth restriction rather than mild bradycardia. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is commonly associated with heart block (especially with anti-Ro/SSA antibodies), which is not displayed here, as true heart block presents with a fixed atrial–ventricular dissociation and FHR < 60 bpm.

Thus, based on fetal physiology and maternal disease correlations taught in NCC-recommended sources, the tracing is most consistent with maternal sickle cell anemia.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (No URLs):

According to AWHONN’s Fetal Assessment Text, Simpson & Miller, and Menihan, vibroacoustic stimulation is utilized during NSTs to elicit fetal accelerations, thereby minimizing testing time.

NCC-referenced sources describe VAS as:

• A method that awakens the fetus,

• Stimulates the fetal auditory system,

• Produces reactive accelerations in a neurologically intact fetus,

• Dramatically shortens NST duration, especially when the fetus is in a sleep cycle.

VAS does NOT measure amniotic fluid, nor does it have any effect on uterine activity (therefore cannot treat tachysystole).

The only correct purpose supported by NCC-cited literature is that VAS shortens the duration of the NST, making Option C correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From NCC-Aligned Sources:

Vagal stimulation is part of the parasympathetic nervous system, which causes:

Slowing of the fetal heart rate (FHR)

Rapid but temporary changes in HR

Seen with head compression, scalp stimulation, or fetal movement

NICHD/NCC physiology explains:

Vagus nerve activation → acetylcholine release → slowed SA node firing → decrease in FHR

This mechanism is responsible for early decelerations during labor due to head compression.

Why the incorrect answers are wrong:

B. Increased cardiac contractility → sympathetic effect, not vagal.

C. Increased fetal blood pressure → also a sympathetic effect.

Correct answer: A. Decreased fetal heart rate