Pass the ITIL ITIL 4 Managing Professional ITIL-4-Specialist-Create-Deliver-and-Support Questions and answers with CertsForce

Reducing the charges for less busy periodshelpsinfluence and smooth out demand, encouraging customers to request services during lower-demand times and reducing peaks.

Customer orientationensures that individual and team objectives are aligned withanticipating and meeting customer needs, directly supporting the organization's goal.

This is an example of service integration as a service (D). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support study guide (Section 3.1.4) defines this model as: "A service integration approach where a third party coordinates and manages services, including supplier relationships and integration, on behalf of the organization." This matches the scenario where the provider handles supplier management and service coordination. Option A (retained service integration) involves internal retention; option B (single provider) implies full delivery; and option C (service guardian) is not a recognized ITIL model. The guide further notes: "This model enhances value streams by ensuring seamless service delivery across multiple parties."

In alast-in, first-outapproach, themost recently loggedwork item is actioned next, which is the item loggedtoday at 11:00.

The organization should use incremental delivery for the integration of multiple components (C). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support study guide (Section 2.1.3) advocates incremental approaches to manage risk and ensure stability during integration. The 'big bang' approach (A) is risky; point-to-point (B) is complex; and no order (D) lacks structure.

The manager should prioritize ensuring that diverse team cultures are aligned with the company’s values (B). This approach fosters inclusivity while maintaining a cohesive framework that supports service delivery goals. The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support documentation (Section 4.3.2) highlights that effective team management involves aligning diverse cultural perspectives with organizational values to enhance collaboration and service quality. Option A imposes a uniform culture, which may suppress diversity; option C lacks structure, risking inefficiency; and option D adjusts the corporate culture excessively, potentially diluting its integrity.

Following a predefined procedurefor investigating web performance incidents ensures astructured and efficient escalation, reducing delays and avoiding confusion about responsibility.

The best approach is to use value stream mapping to analyze and optimize end-to-end workflows (B). The ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support study guide (Section 2.3.2) states: "Value stream mapping provides a holistic view of workflows, identifying waste and inefficiencies across practices, even when individual improvements are in place, to enhance overall service quality and efficiency." This addresses the disconnect between team-level efforts and system-wide results, unlike option A (already in use), option C (a tool, not a strategy), or option D (software-specific). The guide adds: "Mapping ensures alignment of improvements with value stream goals."

Continuous integration (CI) is a practice that involves frequently integrating code changes into a shared repository, allowing teams to detect and resolve issues early. In the context of the scenario, where delays occur due to developers using individual repositories, CI would help by enabling regular integration of code, reducing conflicts, and streamlining the development process. This aligns with the ITIL 4 Specialist: Create, Deliver and Support guidance on optimizing value streams through effective planning and building practices. The official ITIL 4 CDS study guide (Section 2.2.1) emphasizes that CI reduces delays by automating integration and testing, which is critical when managing service creation and changes. Other options like continuous delivery (B) and continuous deployment (C) are subsequent steps that build on CI, while continual improvement (D) is a broader practice not specifically addressing the repository issue.

Shift-leftmoves testing activities earlier in the development lifecycle, helping to detect and fix defects sooner, improving quality and reducing rework.