Pass the International Code Council Fire Inspector Fire-Inspector-II Questions and answers with CertsForce

Minimum Working Space Width for Electrical Equipment Panels

According to National Electrical Code (NEC) 110.26(A)(2) and International Fire Code (IFC) 2021, Section 604.3, the minimum working space width for electrical equipment must be at least the width of the equipment or 30 inches, whichever is greater.

Since the equipment panel in the question is 66 inches wide, the required working space width must be at least 66 inches.

2. Why 66 Inches is the Correct Answer

The minimum clearance width must be equal to the width of the electrical equipment if the panel itself is wider than 30 inches.

This ensures safe maintenance and emergency access to electrical components.

3. Verification of Other Options

Option A (30 inches) – Incorrect, because the equipment is wider than 30 inches, requiring a larger clearance.

Option B (36 inches) – Incorrect, as this is not the requirement for a 66-inch-wide panel.

Option D (78 inches) – Incorrect, as the clearance does not need to exceed the width of the panel.

Reference Sources:

National Electrical Code (NEC) 2023 – Section 110.26(A)(2) (Working Space Width Requirements)

International Fire Code (IFC) 2021 – Section 604.3 (Electrical Equipment Clearance Requirements)

ICC Fire Inspector II Study Guide (2021)

The maximum travel distance to an exit from within a tent is regulated under the 2021 International Fire Code (IFC), Section 3103.12.2 – Means of Egress (Tents and Membrane Structures).

IFC Section 3103.12.2 – Travel Distance:

"The maximum travel distance to an exit shall not exceed 150 feet (45,720 mm)."

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

A. 75 ft. – This limit does not apply to tents; the correct limit is 150 ft.

B. 100 ft. – Too restrictive; the IFC allows up to 150 ft.

D. Any distance approved by the chief. – The fire code does not allow unlimited travel distances; 150 feet is the maximum permitted by code.

✅ Correct Answer: C. 150 ft.

High-Pile Combustible Storage Permit Requirements

According to the International Fire Code (IFC) 2021, Section 105.6.23, a permit is required for the storage of high-pile combustible stock when the storage area exceeds 2,500 square feet.

2. Definition of High-Pile Storage

High-pile storage is defined as storage of combustible materials on racks or piles exceeding 12 feet in height (or 6 feet for highly combustible materials, such as rubber and plastics).

IFC Table 3206.2 establishes fire protection requirements based on storage height, area, and commodity class.

3. Verification of Other Options

Option A (225 sq. ft.) – Incorrect, as this is far below the 2,500 sq. ft. permit threshold.

Option B (500 sq. ft.) – Incorrect, as the fire code does not require a permit at this level.

Option C (1,000 sq. ft.) – Incorrect, as the IFC specifies 2,500 sq. ft. as the threshold for requiring a permit.

Reference Sources:

International Fire Code (IFC) 2021 – Section 105.6.23 (High-Pile Combustible Storage Permit Requirements)

IFC Chapter 32 (High-Piled Storage Regulations)

ICC Fire Inspector II Study Guide (2021)

Thus, the correct and verified answer is: D. 2,500. ✅

IFC Section 901.5 (Acceptance Tests) requires fire protection systems, including fire alarms, to be tested upon completion to ensure compliance with NFPA 72 (National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code) and the IFC. The contractor’s verification of full compliance (B) signals readiness for the official acceptance test by the fire code official, ensuring all components are installed and functional. Option A (zone-by-zone testing) is impractical for final acceptance. Option C ties the test to water supply, irrelevant to alarms. Option D (one year) is excessive and not required by IFC or NFPA 72 for initial acceptance. Thus, B is correct.

Fire Inspection Report as Legal Documentation

A fire inspection report serves as an official record of inspection findings, compliance violations, and corrective actions required.

It provides documented evidence that can be used in legal proceedings if enforcement actions are necessary.

2. Legal Basis and ICC Reference

According to the International Fire Code (IFC) and NFPA Standards, a properly documented inspection report ensures that violations are enforceable in court.

The ICC Fire Inspector Study Guide (2021) emphasizes that an inspection report is a critical legal document that supports the fire department or authority having jurisdiction (AHJ) in case of disputes or appeals.

3. Retention of Reports (Why Other Options Are Incorrect)

Option B (must be copied to the building code official) – Not necessarily required unless local jurisdiction mandates coordination between fire and building code officials.

Option C (must be copied to the city manager or mayor's office) – Fire inspection reports are not typically sent to city administration unless they involve significant violations or policy concerns.

Option D (must be retained by the code official for a minimum of three years) – While record retention is required, the period varies by jurisdiction (some require 3 years, others more), making this an incomplete and less universally correct answer.

Reference Sources:

ICC Fire Inspector II Study Guide (2021)

International Fire Code (IFC) 2021 Edition

NFPA 1031: Standard for Professional Qualifications for Fire Inspector and Plan Examiner

Inspection checklists are valuable tools for fire inspectors, ensuring that key inspection points are consistently reviewed. However, one of their limitations is that they may not cover every potential code violation. This is due to the complexity and variability of fire codes, as well as the uniqueness of each inspection scenario.

Reference to Fire Inspector Documentation:

1. 2021 IFC (International Fire Code) & ICC Fire Inspection Manual

The ICC Fire Inspection Manual (Chapter 4 – Fire Inspection Procedures) emphasizes that while checklists help streamline inspections, they should not be the sole reference. Inspectors must be prepared to identify violations beyond those listed.

2. NFPA 1031 – Standard for Professional Qualifications for Fire Inspector and Plan Examiner

NFPA 1031 (Chapter 4: Fire Inspector I and II Roles & Responsibilities) states that inspectors must apply critical thinking and code knowledge rather than rely solely on pre-prepared lists.

3. 2021 Fire Inspector II Study Guide – ICC

This guide highlights that checklists are helpful but should be supplemented with a thorough knowledge of fire codes to ensure comprehensive inspections.

Detailed Explanation:

Option A (Incorrect): The fact that checklists become a public record is generally not a "problem" but rather a standard practice for transparency and accountability.

Option B (Incorrect): While checklists may take time to complete, this is a minor administrative issue rather than a fundamental problem with their use.

Option C (Correct): The main issue is that no checklist can comprehensively cover all possible violations, requiring inspectors to use judgment and knowledge.

Option D (Incorrect): Although legal appeals may occur, checklists themselves do not typically serve as the direct basis for such challenges.

Thus, the verified and correct answer is: C. They may not address all of the code violations which may be encountered.

 Reference to Occupant Load Factor Calculations:

The International Fire Code (IFC 2021), Table 1004.5 provides occupant load factors for different types of occupancies.

For assembly occupancy with tables and chairs, the occupant load factor is 15 square feet per person (net area).

 Calculation of Occupant Load:

Formula: Occupant Load=Net Square FootageOccupant Load Factor\text{Occupant Load} = \frac{\text{Net Square Footage}}{\text{Occupant Load Factor}}Occupant Load=Occupant Load FactorNet Square Footage​

Given: 2,500 net square feet, with a load factor of 15 sq. ft. per person: 250015=166.67≈167 occupants\frac{2500}{15} = 166.67 \approx 167 \text{ occupants}152500​=166.67≈167 occupants

 Clarification of Incorrect Answer Choices:

A. 167 → Correct

Matches the exact IFC Table 1004.5 calculation.

B. 227 → Incorrect

Would correspond to a lower load factor (about 11 sq. ft. per occupant), which is not the standard for tables and chairs.

C. 357 → Incorrect

Would correspond to a 7 sq. ft. per occupant factor, used for tighter seating arrangements (e.g., assembly without fixed seats).

D. 500 → Incorrect

Would correspond to a 5 sq. ft. per occupant factor, typically used for standing areas or dense seating arrangements.

 Conclusion:

The correct and verified answer is A (167 occupants) based on IFC Table 1004.5, using the standard occupant load factor for assembly occupancies with tables and chairs.

 Reference to Code Modifications and Equivalency Requirements:

According to International Fire Code (IFC 2021), Section 104.10, modifications may be granted if they meet the intent of the code and do not reduce fire and life safety.

The NFPA 1 (Fire Code) and NFPA 101 (Life Safety Code) also allow modifications under specific conditions, provided safety is maintained.

 Understanding the Exception in the Question:

The question asks for conditions that DO NOT warrant a modification.

Using an alternative building material alone does not justify a modification unless it meets equivalent safety standards.

Code modifications are granted based on maintaining or improving safety, not simply changing materials.

 Clarification of Incorrect Answer Choices:

A. Modification does not lessen health, life, and fire safety → Correct condition for modification, so incorrect answer

IFC 104.10 allows modifications as long as safety is not compromised.

C. Modification is in compliance with the intent and purpose of the code → Correct condition for modification, so incorrect answer

Codes provide flexibility if the intent of fire and life safety is still met.

D. Special individual reason makes the strict letter of the code impractical → Correct condition for modification, so incorrect answer

Some codes allow modifications if strict compliance is impractical, provided alternative safety measures are implemented.

 Conclusion:

The correct and verified answer is B (modification requires the use of an alternative building material) because material substitution alone does not justify a modification unless safety is maintained, as per IFC 104.10 and NFPA standards.

The interior finish requirements for walls and ceilings in an atrium are regulated under the 2021 International Building Code (IBC), Section 404 – Atriums, and Table 803.11 – Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish Requirements.

IBC Section 404.8 – Interior Finish in Atriums:

"The interior finish of walls and ceilings in an atrium shall be not less than Class A."

Class A interior finishes have the highest level of fire resistance and low flame spread to minimize fire hazards in large open spaces like atriums.

Class A Interior Finish Ratings (Per ASTM E84 and NFPA 286):

Flame Spread Index: 0 – 25

Smoke Developed Index: 0 – 450

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

B. Class B – Less fire-resistant than Class A, not permitted for atriums.

C. Class C – Provides even lower fire protection, making it unsuitable.

D. Class D – Not recognized as an acceptable interior finish classification for atriums.

 Reference to Explosive Storage Regulations:

The International Fire Code (IFC 2021), Section 5604 and NFPA 495 (Explosive Materials Code) regulate the storage distances for Class 1.3 explosives (which include low explosives such as propellants and display fireworks).

Table 5604.5.2(3) of the IFC provides minimum separation distances between explosives storage and public traffic routes based on the weight of the explosives.

 Determining the Correct Distance:

According to IFC Table 5604.5.2(3), for 1,750 lb. of Class 1.3 explosives, the minimum separation distance from a public traffic route is 115 feet.

 Clarification of Incorrect Answer Choices:

A. 50 ft. → Incorrect

50 feet is too close and does not meet the safety requirements for explosive storage.

B. 75 ft. → Incorrect

75 feet is insufficient based on IFC and NFPA separation tables.

D. 150 ft. → Incorrect

While more distance is safer, the minimum requirement is 115 feet, making 150 feet unnecessary per code.

 Conclusion:

The correct and verified answer is C (115 feet) based on IFC Table 5604.5.2(3) and NFPA 495 requirements for Class 1.3 explosives storage near public traffic routes.