Pass the Google Google Cloud Certified Professional-Cloud-Security-Engineer Questions and answers with CertsForce

Set up a Dedicated Interconnect link between the on-premises environment and Google Cloud:

Dedicated Interconnect provides a direct physical connection between your on-premises network and Google's network, which is ideal for high-throughput, low-latency connections.

Request a Dedicated Interconnect from the Google Cloud Console, specifying the required bandwidth and location.

Once provisioned, set up the connection on your on-premises router and configure the BGP sessions to exchange routes with Google Cloud.

Configure private access using the restricted.googleapis.com domains in on-premises DNS configurations:

Configure your on-premises DNS server to resolve Google APIs to restricted.googleapis.com. This ensures that the traffic stays within the Google network and is not exposed to the public internet.

Update your DNS settings to use restricted.googleapis.com for the necessary API endpoints.

This setup ensures that all Google Cloud API traffic is routed through the private link and subject to VPC Service Controls for additional security and compliance.

The core requirement is to ensure only scanned and verified containers can run in the environment, which is a deployment-time enforcement action.

Binary Authorization is the service designed for this purpose. It is a deployment-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) or other supported container platforms. The core mechanism it uses to verify that an image has completed required steps (like a vulnerability scan) is an attestation.

Extracts:

"GCP Binary Authorization is a security feature designed to prevent the deployment of unverified, unauthorized, or potentially malicious container images to Kubernetes clusters." (Source 1.1)

"Binary Authorization ensures that only images that are signed by trusted entities (such as a trusted attestation authority) are allowed to be deployed." (Source 1.1)

"Binary Authorization aims to reduce the risk of deploying defective, vulnerable, or unauthorized software in this type of environment. Using this service, you can prevent images from being deployed unless it satisfies a policy you define." (Source 1.2)

"The most common Binary Authorization use cases involve attestations. An attestation certifies that a specific image has completed a previous stage... Attestations signify that the associated image was built by successfully executing a specific, required process. For example, the attestation might indicate that the image has passed all required end-to-end functional testing in a staging environment." (Source 1.2, 1.4)

"After a container image is built, an attestation can be created to affirm that a required activity was performed on the image such as a regression test, vulnerability scan, or other test." (Source 1.5)

Option A correctly identifies the two necessary components for this deployment-time enforcement: Binary Authorization for policy enforcement and attestations to certify that the vulnerability scan (or other required check) has been completed and verified.

https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/billing-access#overview-of-cloud-billing-roles-in-cloud-iam

Billing Account Costs Manager (roles/billing.costsManager)

- Manage budgets and view and export cost information of billing accounts (but not pricing information)

Billing Account Viewer (roles/billing.viewer)

- View billing account cost information and transactions.

A. Create a Cloud Build pipeline that will monitor changes to your container templates in a Cloud Source Repositories repository. Add a step to analyze Container Analysis results before allowing the build to continue:

Use Cloud Build to automate your CI/CD pipeline.

Integrate Container Analysis to scan container images for vulnerabilities during the build process.

If vulnerabilities are found, configure the build to fail, preventing deployment of insecure containers.

E. In your CI/CD pipeline, add an attestation on your container image when no vulnerabilities have been found. Use a Binary Authorization policy to block deployments of containers with no attestation in your cluster:

Use Binary Authorization to enforce deploy-time security policies.

Configure your CI/CD pipeline to generate attestations for container images that pass vulnerability scans.

Binary Authorization will then block deployments of any containers without valid attestations, ensuring only secure images are deployed.

The problem has two key requirements:

All applications must send data to a centralized security service.

Developers need high autonomy over firewall rules within their projects.

Prevent accidental blockage of access to the central security service.

This scenario requires a mechanism to enforce critical network policies at a higher level of the resource hierarchy while still allowing project-level flexibility.

Hierarchical Firewall Policies: Google Cloud's Hierarchical Firewall Policies (HFP) are designed precisely for this purpose. They allow administrators to define firewall rules at the organization or folder level, and these rules are inherited by all projects and VPC networks within that hierarchy. Crucially, HFP rules can be prioritized. Rules with higher priority (lower numerical value) are evaluated first. This means you can create high-priority "allow" rules for critical services that cannot be overridden or blocked by project-level firewall rules.Extract Reference: "Hierarchical firewall policies allow you to define and enforce consistent network security policies across your organization. Policies can be applied at the organization or folder level, and they are inherited by all projects and VPC networks within that hierarchy." and "Rules in a hierarchical firewall policy can take precedence over VPC network firewall rules based on priority. A rule with a lower priority value takes precedence over a rule with a higher priority value." (Google Cloud documentation: https://cloud.google.com/vpc/docs/firewall-policies-overview)

Preventing Accidental Blockage while Allowing Autonomy: By setting a high-priority "allow" rule for the central security service in a hierarchical firewall policy, you guarantee that this traffic will always be permitted, regardless of what project-level firewall rules developers might configure. This ensures the critical connectivity while still allowing developers to manage other, less critical firewall rules within their projects with high autonomy.

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Deploy a central Secure Web Proxy and connect it to all VPC networks. Create a Secure Web Proxy policy to allow traffic to the central security service. A Secure Web Proxy is for HTTP/S outbound traffic to external web services. The central security service might not be an external web service, and this solution is focused on application-layer proxies, not general network connectivity like sending data to an internal service. Also, it doesn't directly address the challenge of developers blocking access with project-level firewall rules.

C. Create a central project to manage Shared VPC networks which will be accessible to all other projects. Administer all firewall rules centrally within this project. While Shared VPC centralizes network management, it means all firewall rules are administered centrally. This directly contradicts the requirement for developers to have "high autonomy to configure firewall rules within their projects." Shared VPC would centralize too much control for this specific scenario.

D. Use Terraform to automate the creation of the required firewall rule in all projects. Restrict rule change permissions solely to the Terraform service account. This approach automates the creation but doesn't prevent developers from creating conflicting or overriding rules in their projects (unless Terraform is used to manage all rules, again removing autonomy). It also relies on restricting IAM permissions for all firewall rules, which is against the "high autonomy" requirement for developers. Hierarchical firewall policies offer a more robust and native solution for overriding and enforcing specific rules.

Therefore, implementing a hierarchical firewall policy is the most effective solution, as it allows for the enforcement of critical security service connectivity at a higher level, while still granting developers the desired autonomy over their project-specific firewall rules.

Objective: Ensure private communication between application tiers in different GCP Organizations.

Solution: Use VPC peering to enable private communication without traversing the public internet.

Steps:

Step 1: Open the Google Cloud Console.

Step 2: Navigate to the VPC Network Peering page.

Step 3: Create a new VPC peering connection in the project hosting the application tier.

Step 4: Specify the VPC network in the other organization (hosting the storage tier) to peer with.

Step 5: Accept the peering request in the other project.

Step 6: Configure the necessary routes and firewall rules to allow traffic between the peered VPC networks.

VPC peering allows you to connect two VPC networks privately and directly, ensuring that traffic between them does not traverse the public internet.

For massive daily data transfers (250 TB) between cloud providers, traditional VPNs or routing through on-premises "hairpinning" are inefficient and costly. Cross-Cloud Interconnect is the architecturally correct solution for high-bandwidth, low-latency, and secure cloud-to-cloud connectivity.

According to Google Cloud Documentation (Cross-Cloud Interconnect Overview):

"Cross-Cloud Interconnect helps you establish high-bandwidth dedicated connectivity between Google Cloud and another cloud service provider (CSP) such as Microsoft Azure... It simplifies multi-cloud setup by providing a direct physical connection between Google's network and the other CSP's network."

Calculation of Requirement:

Data Volume: 250 TB per day.

Time: 86,400 seconds (1 day).

Required Bandwidth: $250 \times 10^{12} \text{ bytes} \times 8 \text{ bits/byte} / 86,400 \text{ seconds} \approx 23.1 \text{ Gbps}$.

A standard VPN (Option B) typically caps out at 3 Gbps per tunnel, making it insufficient.

The existing 20Gbps Interconnect (Option C) is already used for on-premises data and would be overwhelmed by an additional 23.1 Gbps requirement, not to mention the latency of routing Azure traffic through an on-premises data center.

Why other options are incorrect:

B is incorrect: VPN throughput is insufficient for 250 TB/day and lacks the reliability of a dedicated circuit.

C is incorrect: Routing through on-premises (hairpinning) introduces unnecessary latency and would exceed the 20Gbps capacity of the existing Interconnect.

D is incorrect: SFTP over the public internet is neither efficient for petabyte-scale data nor as secure as a private interconnect.

The goal is to detect cryptocurrency mining software using Security Command Center (SCC).

Security Command Center Threat Detection Services: SCC Premium and Enterprise tiers offer various specialized threat detection services.

Virtual Machine Threat Detection (VMTD): This service is explicitly designed to scan virtual machines (Compute Engine instances and GKE nodes) for specific threats, including cryptocurrency mining software. It operates at the hypervisor level, performing deep scans of VM memory and disks.Extract Reference: "Virtual Machine Threat Detection (VMTD) helps you detect potential threats, such as cryptocurrency mining and malware, within your Compute Engine instances and GKE nodes." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Virtual Machine Threat Detection overview | Security Command Center" - https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/concepts-vm-threat-detection-overview)

Extract Reference: "This service scans virtual machines to detect potentially malicious applications, such as cryptocurrency mining software, kernel-mode rootkits, and malware running in compromised cloud environments." (Google Cloud Documentation: "Virtual Machine Threat Detection overview | Security Command Center" - https://cloud.google.com/security-command-center/docs/concepts-vm-threat-detection-overview)

Let's evaluate the other options:

A. Web Security Scanner: This service scans for common web application vulnerabilities like XSS, Flash injection, and mixed content. It is not designed to detect runtime threats like cryptocurrency mining software.

B. Container Threat Detection: While Container Threat Detection (CTD) also detects cryptocurrency mining, it specifically focuses on runtime threats within GKE containers. The question asks for detection of "cryptocurrency mining software" generally, and VMs are a common target for such activity (and GKE nodes are VMs). VMTD provides a more general detection across Compute Engine VMs and GKE nodes for this specific type of threat. If the context explicitly mentioned containers or Cloud Run, CTD would be the more specific answer. However, for a general detection of "software" on "workloads", and given that VMTD explicitly lists "cryptocurrency mining software" for VMs, it is the most direct and broadly applicable answer among the choices.

C. Rapid Vulnerability Detection: This service actively scans internet-exposed assets for network vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. It focuses on finding known vulnerabilities, not detecting active malicious processes like cryptocurrency mining.

Given the direct and explicit mention of cryptocurrency mining detection for VMs in its documentation, Virtual Machine Threat Detection is the correct SCC service to use.