Pass the Google Google Cloud Certified Associate-Cloud-Engineer Questions and answers with CertsForce

From this source:https://cloud.google.com/billing/docs/how-to/custom-roles#permission_association_and_inheritance

"For example, associating a project with a billing account requires the billing.resourceAssociations.create permission on the billing account and also the resourcemanager.projects.createBillingAssignment permission on the project. This is because project permissions are required for actions where project owners control access, while billing account permissions are required for actions where billing account administrators control access. When both should be involved, both permissions are necessary."

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The issue is Cloud SQL API quota errors caused by too many new Cloud Run instances being created simultaneously during a traffic spike. Each new instance attempts a connection to Cloud SQL, consuming the connection API quota.

The Documented Solution (Not an Option): Google's official documentation states the correct mitigation for this specific error is to decrease the maximum number of Cloud Run instances to slow the rate of new instance creation.

Flawed Option Set: Since the correct mitigation is not an option, and increasing the maximum instances (D) would technically worsen the quota error, the question is structurally flawed. However, in the context of general autoscaling management, Option D is the configuration control point for the upper limit of scaling. In many exam scenarios, this forces the selection of the control that directly impacts the scaling capacity, even if the intended direction is incorrect for the specific error given. We select D as the configuration change most directly related to the number of instances, while acknowledging the documentation advises the opposite action.

Comprehensive and Detailed In Depth Explanation:

The goal is to proactively identify stuck Dataflow jobs with minimal management effort. Let's analyze each option:

A. Error Reporting for slowdowns: Error Reporting primarily focuses on capturing and aggregating exceptions and errors (stack traces). While a stuck job might eventually throw an error, it might also just become unresponsive without generating explicit errors. Relying solely on Error Reporting might not provide timely detection of stuck jobs. Identifying stack traces that indicate slowdowns can also be complex and require significant manual configuration and analysis.

B. Personalized Service Health dashboard: The Personalized Service Health dashboard provides information about Google Cloud service incidents that might be affecting your resources. While it can alert you to broader Dataflow service outages, it won't specifically identify individual stuck jobs due to application-level errors or logic within your Dataflow pipeline.

C. Pub/Sub messages for delays, backup job, and Cloud Tasks alerts: This approach involves significant custom implementation and management. You would need to instrument your Dataflow jobs to detect delays, send messages to Pub/Sub, manage a backup job, and configure Cloud Tasks for alerting. This adds considerable operational overhead and complexity.

D. Cloud Monitoring alerts on data freshness metric: Dataflow provides built-in metrics, including "data freshness" (or similar metrics like "system lag" or "processing time"), which indicate how far behind the pipeline is in processing data. If a job gets stuck, the data freshness will deteriorate beyond an acceptable threshold. Cloud Monitoring allows you to easily set up alerts based on these built-in metrics. This requires minimal custom coding and leverages the platform's existing monitoring capabilities, aligning with the "minimal management effort" requirement.

Therefore, setting up Cloud Monitoring alerts on relevant Dataflow metrics like data freshness is the most efficient and recommended way to detect stuck Dataflow jobs with minimal management overhead.

Google Cloud Documentation References:

Monitoring Dataflow Pipelines: https://cloud.google.com/dataflow/docs/guides/monitoring-your-pipeline - This document details the various metrics available for monitoring Dataflow jobs in Cloud Monitoring, including metrics related to processing time, system lag, and data freshness.

Creating Alerts in Cloud Monitoring: https://cloud.google.com/monitoring/alerts/create - Explains how to set up alerts based on metrics collected by Cloud Monitoring.

Dataflow Metrics: https://cloud.google.com/dataflow/docs/reference/monitoring-metrics - Provides a comprehensive list of Dataflow metrics that can be used for monitoring and alerting.

C:\GCP\appeng>gcloud config list

[core]

account = xxx@gmail.com

disable_usage_reporting = False

project = my-first-demo-xxxx

https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/openapi/troubleshoot-gce-deployment

The goal is to create a landing zone facilitating private IP communication across production projects and apply organization-wide firewall rules, following best practices and minimizing operational costs.

Network Structure:Individual VPCs with Peering (A, B): While VPC Peering allows private connectivity, managing a full mesh or complex peering topology across many projects becomes operationally complex and can hit peering limits. It's not the recommended pattern for centralized connectivity in a landing zone.

Shared VPC (C, D): This is the Google-recommended practice for scenarios where resources from multiple projects need to communicate privately within a common VPC network. A central host project owns the network, and service projects use it. This simplifies network administration and connectivity.

Firewall Rules:Organization Policies (A, C): These enforce organizational constraints (e.g., disable external IPs, restrict locations) but do not define specific network firewall rules (like allowing TCP ports).

Hierarchical Firewall Policies (B, D): These allow defining firewall rules at the Organization or Folder level, which are inherited by resources in descendant projects/folders. This is the mechanism to apply consistent firewall rules (like allowing specific TCP ports) across all VMs in the organization (or a specific folder) efficiently, without managing rules in each individual VPC or project.

Combining Shared VPC for the network structure (best practice for cross-project private communication and central management) with Hierarchical Firewall Policies (for applying organization-wide firewall rules) meets all requirements efficiently and follows Google recommendations.