Pass the Esri ArcGIS Enterprise EGMP2201 Questions and answers with CertsForce

 Understanding the Scenario:

The regional office lacks access toArcGIS Enterprise,ArcGIS Online accounts, or anenterprise geodatabase.

Data must be distributed in a format that the regional office can use independently of enterprise-level systems.

 Data Distribution Solutions Overview:

Geodatabase Replication:

Geodatabase replication allows data to be exported and shared with external systems, such as file or personal geodatabases.

Replicas can be set up in adisconnected mode, enabling regional offices to work with the data offline.

Distributed Collaboration:Distributed collaboration facilitates sharing data and content between ArcGIS Enterprise and ArcGIS Online environments. It is unsuitable for offices without these systems.

Partnered Collaborations:Partnered collaborations extend distributed collaboration to partner organizations, but they also require ArcGIS Online accounts, making them incompatible with this scenario.

 Steps to Implement Geodatabase Replication:

Create aone-way replicaof the data in a format compatible with the regional office’s systems (e.g., file geodatabase).

Transfer the replica to the regional office via portable media or secure file sharing.

Set up periodic updates if the data needs to be refreshed.

 References:

Esri Documentation: Geodatabase Replication.

Disconnected Workflows: Best practices for sharing data in offline environments.

 Why the Correct Answer is A:Geodatabase replication is the most suitable solution for sharing data with a regional office that lacks enterprise-level systems. Distributed and partnered collaborations require ArcGIS Enterprise or ArcGIS Online accounts, which are unavailable in this scenario.

Scenario Overview:

Editors reconcile and post daily, but read-only versions created for analysis are not reconciled or posted.

The geodatabase is compressed nightly, but performance continues to degrade.

Cause of the Problem:

Unreconciled versions, including read-only ones, persist in the state tree, preventing the geodatabase compression from fully collapsing unused states.

Over time, this results in a bloated state tree and worsened performance.

Solution:

Reconciling and posting the read-only versions ensures that the state tree is cleared of unnecessary versions, enabling compression to collapse the database to its optimal state.

(ArcGIS Documentation: Reconcile and Post)

Alternative Options:

Option B: Creating a database view provides a read-only representation of data but does not address the underlying issue of unresolved states in the state tree.

Option C: Disabling editor tracking is unrelated to state tree performance issues and has no impact on the reconciliation or compression processes.

Therefore, reconciling the read-only versions will significantly improve performance.

The issue arises because the standard database view is based on the base table of the points feature class, which does not include edits made in child versions. To resolve this, the database view must reference aversioned viewto reflect changes in the Default version.

1. What Is a Versioned View?

Aversioned viewis created when a feature class is registered as versioned.

It allows querying and editing versioned data, including edits made in the Default version and child versions.

A standard database view does not account for the Adds and Deletes delta tables used in versioning, which is why edits are not visible.

2. Why Alter the View to Use a Versioned View?

By modifying the standard database view to reference the versioned view, the published web layer will reflect changes made in the Default version, including ongoing edits.

This ensures that updates to the points feature class are visible in the web layer without requiring manual intervention.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Have All Editors Reconcile and Post Points Edits to Default:

While this ensures edits are moved to the Default version, it requires continuous manual reconciliation and posting, which is impractical for a frequently edited dataset.

Rebuild Indexes and Calculate Database Statistics on Points:

These actions improve query performance but do not address the core issue of the standard view not reflecting versioned edits.

Steps to Alter the View:

Identify the versioned view associated with the points feature class. It typically has a name like points_EVW.

Modify the SQL for the existing view to reference the versioned view:

CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW points_web AS

SELECT FROM points_EVW;

Update the web layer to use the modified view as the data source.

Test the web layer to confirm that edits made to the Default version are now visible.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Versioned Views in Enterprise Geodatabases

Publishing Data from Views

Conclusion:

To ensure edits made to the points feature class are visible in the web layer, thedatabase view should be altered to reference the versioned view, which accounts for edits in the Default version.

Scenario Overview:

Five feature classes are added to afeature dataset, which is registered as versionedwithout the move-edits-to-base option.

Afterward, another feature class is added to the same feature dataset.

Users encounter errors when trying to edit any feature class in the feature dataset.

Cause of the Problem:When a feature dataset is registered as versioned, all feature classes within it must maintain consistency in their versioning state. Adding a new feature class to a previously versioned feature dataset can disrupt the synchronization, causing errors during editing.

Solution:

Unregister as versioned on the feature dataset:This removes versioning from all feature classes in the dataset, resetting their versioning state.

Register the feature dataset as versioned again:This ensures all feature classes, including the newly added one, are correctly registered with the same versioning state.(ArcGIS Documentation: Registering Datasets as Versioned)

Alternative Options:

Option B:Registering the feature dataset again would not resolve the issue because versioning conflicts persist unless the entire feature dataset is unregistered and re-registered.

Option C:Switching to the move-edits-to-base option is unnecessary and alters the editing workflow, which may not align with the current setup or user needs.

Thus, the administrator shouldunregister the feature dataset as versioned and re-register itto resolve the errors.

To determine if theAddsandDeletestables for the "Buildings" dataset are empty before unregistering as versioned, the GIS administrator needs to reference thesde_layerstable.

1. Purpose of the sde_layers Table

Thesde_layerstable tracks the relationship between base tables and the associated delta tables (Adds and Deletes).

For each versioned dataset, the sde_layers table contains entries linking the dataset to its corresponding A and D tables (e.g., A_ and D_).

2. Steps to Verify Adds and Deletes

Identify theObjectIDof the Buildings dataset in thesde_layerstable.

Query the Adds table (A_) and Deletes table (D_) associated with the Buildings dataset:

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM A_;

SELECT COUNT(*) FROM D_;

If both queries return 0, the Adds and Deletes tables are empty, and it is safe to unregister the dataset as versioned.

3. Why Not Other Options?

table_registry: This table tracks registered datasets but does not provide information about delta tables or their contents.

gdb_items: This table stores metadata for datasets but does not have details on delta table contents.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Compressing a Geodatabase—ArcGIS Pro Documentation

Delta Tables in Versioned Geodatabases

Conclusion:

The GIS administrator must query thesde_layerstable to verify the Adds and Deletes tables before unregistering the dataset as versioned.

Scenario Overview:

The GIS data administrator is experiencinglagwhen changing the parameter value of adefinition query.

Definition queries dynamically filter data based on attribute values. Slow performance often indicates inefficient attribute searches.

Solution: Add Attribute Index

Anattribute indexallows the database to quickly locate rows based on values in the indexed column, significantly improving query performance.

When definition queries rely on non-indexed fields, the database must scan the entire dataset to filter records, leading to noticeable delays.

By creating an attribute index on the fields used in the definition query, the database can optimize filtering, reducing lag.(ArcGIS Documentation: Attribute Indexes)

Steps to Add Attribute Index:

In ArcGIS Pro, open theAttribute Indexestool.

Select thefeature class or tableused in the definition query.

Specify the field(s) that the definition query is based on.

ClickRunto create the index.

Alternative Options:

Option B: Add Spatial Index

Spatial indexes optimize spatial queries (e.g., finding features within an area). This does not address attribute-based definition query lag.

Option C: Recalculate Extent

Recalculating the extent corrects boundary discrepancies in spatial datasets but has no impact on attribute query performance.

Thus, adding anattribute indexis the correct action to resolve lag in definition queries.

Scenario Overview:

Multiple editors need tocollaboratively editthe same dataset using a web application.

Requirements:

Editors work inisolationuntil they reach a stopping point.

Edits are shared with others at the stopping point.

Editors can view shared edits without sharing their own.

Branch Versioning in Enterprise Geodatabases:

Branch versioning is specifically designed for collaborative editing inweb-based workflows.

It supportsisolated editingby creating branches for each editor and allows users to reconcile and post changes at their discretion.

Editors canchoose to reconcile shared changes without posting their own edits, fulfilling the requirement to view shared edits without sharing their own.(ArcGIS Documentation: Branch Versioning)

Key Features of Branch Versioning:

Supports Web Applications:Designed to work seamlessly with feature services, enabling real-time collaborative editing.

Isolation:Each editor can edit independently in their branch.

Reconciliation:Editors can reconcile and view changes made by others without posting their edits.

Flexible Sharing:Editors control when to post edits.

Alternative Options:

Option B: Traditional versioned with editor tracking enabled:

Traditional versioning supports isolated editing, but it does not provide the flexibility to view shared changes without posting your own edits.

It is also not as well-suited for web-based collaborative workflows.

Option C: Traditional versioned with the option to move edits to base:

Moving edits to base bypasses versioning workflows entirely and is not designed for collaborative editing.

Thus,branch versioningis the optimal solution for the requirements of this collaborative editing workflow in a web application.

When users report that they are unable to connect to the geodatabase after nightly maintenance, and the GIS administrator can connect successfully, the issue is likely due to the geodatabase being set todeny new connectionsduring or after the maintenance process.

1. Geodatabase Maintenance and Connections

During maintenance, administrators often set the geodatabase to deny connections to prevent user interference.

If this setting is not reverted after maintenance, users will be unable to connect, but the administrator may still connect using their direct privileges.

2. Steps to Check if the Geodatabase is Accepting Connections

OpenArcGIS ProorArcGIS Enterprise Manager.

Go to the geodatabase properties.

Check the"Connections"setting:

Ensure the option"Accept Connections"is enabled.

3. Why Not Other Options?

Number of Maximum Connections:

While a connection limit could block users, the administrator would also face this issue if the limit was reached.

Correct Username and Password:

This is unlikely the issue if multiple users suddenly report the same problem after maintenance.

References from Esri Documentation and Learning Resources:

Managing Geodatabase Connections

Maintenance Best Practices for Enterprise Geodatabases

Conclusion:

The GIS administrator should check if thegeodatabase is accepting connectionsto resolve the issue.

Scenario Overview:

Editors are spending multiple hours resolving conflicts during reconciliation.

Key points:

Conflicts are detected by attribute (not by object).

Traditional versioning is used.

Weekly compression and weekly reconcile/post workflows are in place.

Why Reconcile and Post Daily?

Conflicts occur when multiple editors make overlapping edits. The longer versions remain unreconciled, the more conflicts accumulate, leading to time-consuming resolution.

Daily reconciliation and posting minimizes the number of changes between the parent and child versions, reducing the likelihood and volume of conflicts.

(ArcGIS Documentation: Reconcile and Post)

Key Benefits of Daily Reconciliation:

Fewer Changes to Compare: With fewer edits accumulated in each version, conflict detection is faster.

Less Complex Conflicts: Simplifies resolution since changes are smaller and more recent.

Improved Editor Productivity: Editors spend less time resolving conflicts, freeing up time for other tasks.

Alternative Options:

Option A: Detect conflicts by object

While this may reduce conflict granularity, it can lead to overwriting valid edits at the object level, which may not be acceptable in collaborative workflows.

Option B: Compress the geodatabase daily

Compression reduces the state tree and improves performance but does not directly reduce the number of conflicts during reconciliation.

Therefore, implementing daily reconciliation and posting is the most effective way to reduce conflicts and improve editing efficiency.

 Understanding the Scenario:The database administrator wants to improve the performance of a nightly data load process, which involves truncating and appending a large table with geometry and several attributes. The current Append operation takes 120 minutes, and indexes are re-created after the data is loaded.

 Identifying the Bottleneck:

Spatial indexes speed up query performance but can significantly slow down data loading operations like Append.

When loading large datasets, maintaining the spatial index during the operation forces constant updates, leading to performance degradation.

 Recommended Optimization:

Removing the Spatial Index:

Before the Append operation, drop the spatial index to eliminate overhead during data insertion.

After the Append operation completes, recreate the spatial index to restore query performance.

This approach ensures that the Append process only focuses on inserting records without additional computational load from maintaining the spatial index.

 Steps to Implement the Recommendation:

Drop the spatial index using the appropriate database management command or tool.

Execute the Append process.

Rebuild the spatial index once the Append process is complete.

 References:

Esri Documentation: Best practices for large data loads: Managing Indexes.

Spatial Index Concepts: Understanding how spatial indexes impact data loading operations.

 Why the Correct Answer is B:Removing the spatial index before appending large datasets can significantly reduce the time required for data insertion. Options A (removing the objectid index) and C (adding a unique key index) are irrelevant because the objectid index is system-managed and the unique key index creation would not improve the performance of the Append operation.