Pre-Summer Special Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: force70

VMware Advanced VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Storage 3V0-23.25 Question # 23 Topic 3 Discussion

VMware Advanced VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Storage 3V0-23.25 Question # 23 Topic 3 Discussion

3V0-23.25 Exam Topic 3 Question 23 Discussion:
Question #: 23
Topic #: 3

An architect is designing a vSAN Original Storage Architecture (OSA) cluster for a VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) Management Domain. The following details were made available:

• 12 hosts, each host with: 3 x 800 GB NVMe (cache) and 12 x 3.84 TB SAS SSD (capacity).

• Planned configuration: 3 disk groups per host (1 NVMe + 4 SSD each).

• Storage policy: FTT = 2 (RAID-1), Checksum. Deduplication and Compression are Enabled.

• Network: 25 GbE dedicated vSAN network fabric, properly configured for jumbo frames.

After deployment and loading test data to 70% capacity, the operations team reported extended resync times when two hosts are placed into maintenance mode with “Ensure Accessibility” selected and no hardware or network bottlenecks were detected.

How can the administrator explain the observed behavior?


A.

With 3 disk groups per host, vSAN introduces additional metadata and resync operations under FTT = 2.


B.

“Ensure Accessibility” triggers a full component migration when FTT = 2, regardless of available quorum.


C.

NVMe devices in the cache tier limit backend de-staging throughput during resync.


D.

Deduplication and compression cause cache-tier contention during resync.


Get Premium 3V0-23.25 Questions

Contribute your Thoughts:


Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.