The strategy designer at Cloud Kicks is using a How Might We statement to frame their design challenge. What should they do to test their statement to ensure it successfully guides their design process?
A good HMW statement is tested by running rapid ideation to see if it generates a broad variety of creative ideas. In the Platform Strategy Designer context, this question belongs primarily to Value Design. In Value Design, the strategy designer links validated human needs to business outcomes and external context, then defines measurable signals that show whether the intended value is actually being created. Rapid ideation is a practical test of a How Might We statement because a good statement should generate multiple plausible ideas quickly. If the team cannot generate alternatives, the framing may be too narrow, too broad, or too solution-biased and should be revised. Here, Use rapid ideation with project team. is the strongest choice because it most directly matches the outcome, constraint, or decision described in the scenario. The other choices may be useful in a different stage or for a different question, but they do not address the central requirement as directly. Test the statement with end users. focuses attention elsewhere, while Launch an online survey. addresses a related concern without providing the same fit to the scenario ' s stated objective. That distinction is important on the exam: select the method or capability that resolves the specific uncertainty in the scenario rather than the option that is merely plausible in a broader project.
Study Guide Topics: Value Design
Official Salesforce Reference: Challenge Framing and Scoping - Create Effective How Might We Statements
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit