When analyzing l&T-related risk, an enterprise defines likelihood and impact on a scale from 1 to 5, and the scale of impact also defines a range expressed in monetary terms. Which of the following risk analysis approaches has been adopted?
When an enterprise defines likelihood and impact on a scale from 1 to 5, and the scale of impact also defines a range expressed in monetary terms, a hybrid approach has been adopted. Here’s why:
Qualitative Approach: This approach uses descriptive scales and subjective assessments to evaluate risk likelihood and impact. It does not typically involve monetary terms.
Quantitative Approach: This method uses numerical values and statistical models to measure risk, often involving monetary terms and precise calculations.
Hybrid Approach: This combines elements of both qualitative and quantitative approaches. By defining likelihood on a scale (qualitative) and expressing impact in monetary terms (quantitative), the enterprise is using a hybrid approach. This allows for a comprehensive assessment that leverages the strengths of both methods.
Therefore, the described method represents a hybrid approach to risk analysis.
References:
ISA 315 Anlage 5 and 6: Detailed guidelines on risk assessment and analysis methodologies.
ISO-27001 and GoBD standards for risk management and business impact analysis.
These references provide a comprehensive understanding of the principles and methodologies involved in IT risk and audit processes.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit