Qualitative analysis is a method that uses subjective judgments and opinions to assess plausible risk scenarios that could result in reputational risk to the enterprise. Qualitative analysis can help identify the sources, causes, and impacts of reputational risk, as well as the likelihood and severity of such risk. Qualitative analysis can also involve stakeholder feedback, surveys, interviews, focus groups, and expert opinions to evaluate the reputation of the enterprise and its IT functions.

The other options are not the most likely methods to assess plausible risk scenarios that could result in reputational risk to the enterprise. Controls gap analysis is a method that compares the existing controls with the required controls to identify any deficiencies or weaknesses that could expose the enterprise to risk. Controls gap analysis can help improve the effectiveness and efficiency of IT processes and services, but it does not directly assess the reputational risk scenarios. Quantitative analysis is a method that uses numerical data and mathematical models to measure and evaluate risk scenarios. Quantitative analysis can help estimate the financial impact and probability of risk events, but it may not capture the intangible and subjective aspects of reputational risk. SWOT analysis is a method that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an organization or a project. SWOT analysis can help identify the internal and external factors that affect the performance and success of the organization or the project, but it does not specifically assess the reputational risk scenarios.

For more information on qualitative analysis and reputational risk, you can refer to these web sources:

Qualitative Risk Analysis: What it is and how to implement it

Reputational Risk Management: A Framework for Measurement

Reputational Risk Management in IT Outsourcing: A Case Study