When AI systems make consequential decisions over sensitive data, AAISM requires explicit performance thresholds tied to decision quality—i.e., accuracy (and related error/false-rate limits) aligned to business risk appetite and regulatory expectations. Availability and latency are important service metrics, but decision integrity and error bounds are primary risk drivers in sensitive contexts. Establishing, monitoring, and enforcing minimum accuracy thresholds (with subgroup performance checks) is essential to reduce harm, ensure fairness/compliance, and support auditability.
[References:• AI Security Management™ (AAISM) Body of Knowledge: Risk-aligned performance metrics; decision quality thresholds; harm and error-rate governance in sensitive processing.• AI Security Management™ Study Guide: Metric selection for high-risk AI; accuracy, false positive/negative limits, and acceptance criteria tied to business controls., ]
Submit