Within the ISACA Advanced in AI Risk framework, governance decisions should align AI use with policy, accountability, stakeholder expectations, risk appetite, and applicable legal or ethical obligations. Mapping identified AI risks to organizational objectives translates technical exposure into business consequences and ensures risk is considered in strategic decisions. Workshops and vulnerability reports help identify issues but do not create the same direct strategy linkage. This makes option A, Map AI risk to organizational objectives, the strongest answer. The other choices describe narrower technical, operational, performance, or administrative considerations and do not address the primary risk-management objective in the scenario as directly. A risk practitioner should select the response that most effectively reduces the stated exposure while preserving appropriate oversight, traceability, and alignment with organizational risk tolerance and business requirements.