Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego(1981) examined a city ordinance banning off-site billboards, raising questions about freedom of speech under the First Amendment, as billboards involve commercial speech. The Supreme Court ruled that while some restrictions were permissible, the ordinance was overly broad. Option C (freedom of speech) is correct. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego(1981) addressed freedom of speech in the context of billboard regulations.” Option A (aesthetics) was a secondary concern. Option B (obscenity) is unrelated. Option D (due process) was not the focus. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Metromediaexamined freedom of speech in development regulation,” supporting option C.
[References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Planning Law., , ]
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit