A company wants a flexible compute solution that includes Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Fargate. The company does not want to commit to multi-year contracts.
Which purchasing option will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
A.
Purchase a 1-year EC2 Instance Savings Plan with the All Upfront option.
B.
Purchase a 1-year Compute Savings Plan with the No Upfront option.
C.
Purchase a 1-year Compute Savings Plan with the Partial Upfront option.
D.
Purchase a 1-year Compute Savings Plan with the All Upfront option.
To optimize costs for both Amazon EC2 and AWS Fargate, the best option is a Compute Savings Plan because it offers flexibility across instance families, Regions, and compute options including EC2, AWS Fargate, and AWS Lambda.
Unlike EC2 Instance Savings Plans, which apply only to specific instance families, Compute Savings Plans apply across multiple services.
Since the company does not want to commit to multi-year contracts or large upfront payments, the 1-year No Upfront Compute Savings Plan provides the greatest flexibility with no upfront capital commitment, while still offering cost savings over On-Demand pricing.
This option also aligns with cost-optimization best practices by allowing for scalability and service mix flexibility.
???? Reference:
AWS Compute Savings Plans
AWS Pricing Models
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit