CFE investigative guidance recognizes online databases as valuable tools for locating public records quickly, but it also highlights practical limitations. The most significant limitation is that availability and coverage differ widely by jurisdiction. Some jurisdictions provide extensive online access to court files, property records, corporate registrations, and liens, while others provide limited access, partial indexing, or require in-person requests. This variability affects completeness and can create false negatives (records exist but are not available electronically). The guidance also cautions that online results may be abstracts, may not include supporting documentation, and can lag behind official updates—so investigators should verify key records with the originating agency when accuracy and completeness matter. Option A is not the primary limitation described; the more common problem is incomplete access rather than excessive detail. Option C is too absolute; errors can occur, but CFE methodology emphasizes validation, not the claim that records are “rarely correct.” Option D is also overstated; while source credibility matters, the fundamental limitation is uneven jurisdictional availability and completeness.