Proactive Fraud Auditing Procedures:
Analytical reviews are effective for identifying large or unusual trends and anomalies, not necessarily small frauds.
Other tools, such as detailed transaction testing, are better suited for uncovering small frauds.
Analysis of Other Options:
A. Element of surprise:A key feature of fraud audits.
C. Fraud assessment questioning:Valid as part of the audit process.
D. Management’s intentions:Proactive procedures signal a strong stance against fraud.
Conclusion:Option B is false because analytical reviews are better at detecting significant anomalies rather than small frauds.
[References:ACFE materials on fraud auditing techniques., , , ]
Submit