Pass the CSI Canadian Securities Course IFC Questions and answers with CertsForce

While comparing Fund Facts of the different mutual funds, Simone points out that not only are the fund management expenses different but so are the investor profiles for each fund. This behaviour from Simone is ethical because it shows that she is providing accurate and complete information to Pierre and helping him make an informed decision based on his personal circumstances and objectives4. Fund Facts is a document that summarizes key information about a mutual fund, such as its investment objectives, risks, fees, performance history, and investor rights5. By comparing Fund Facts of different mutual funds, Simone can help Pierre understand how each fund differs in terms of its suitability, costs, and potential returns. The other behaviours from Simone are unethical because they do not serve Pierre’s best interests or comply with professional standards. Simone’s ability to keep her knowledge current on competitors’ investment offerings does not necessarily show that she is putting her client’s interest first. She may have other motives for researching other funds, such as trying to persuade Pierre to stay with her dealer’s funds or finding new opportunities for herself4. Knowing Pierre does not like that her dealer’s funds have trailer fees, she chooses not to discuss the relationship between trailer fees and MER while making comparisons. This behaviour is unethical because it is misleading and omits relevant information that Pierre should know before investing4. Trailer fees are fees paid by the fund manager to the dealer for the ongoing services provided by the dealer and its advisors to unitholders5. Trailer fees are part of the management expense ratio (MER), which is the total cost of running and distributing a fund expressed as a percentage of its assets5. Trailer fees and MERs affect the net returns of a fund and may create conflicts of interest between the advisor and the client5. When comparing her dealer’s own mutual funds to the one Pierre discovered, Simone emphasizes the importance of similar net rates of return and minimizes the significance of management expense ratios (MERs). This behaviour is unethical because it is biased and does not present a balanced view of the pros and cons of each fund4. Net rates of return are not the only factor to consider when evaluating a fund’s performance. MERs are also important because they reduce the fund’s gross returns and may indicate how efficiently the fund is managed5. A fund with a lower MER may have an advantage over a fund with a higher MER, all else being equal5. References: Unit 2: Know Your Client, What’s a good MER fee plus 3 strategies to avoid high fees - Bellvest

If Helen believes in the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH), she accepts that markets fully reflect available information and that it is nearly impossible to consistently beat the market.

The recommended action is passive investing, e.g., buying an index-tracking ETF.

B (market timing) and D (security selection) contradict EMH.

The statement that is correct about Jehona’s permitted activities is option B. According to Section 13.3 of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (NI 31-103), registered individuals must not engage in discretionary trading, meaning that they must not execute a transaction for a client’s account without the specific authorization of the client before the transaction. Therefore, if Jehona wants to execute trades for Sokol’s account, Sokol must provide his specific authorization before the trades are entered. The other statements are not correct about Jehona’s permitted activities. Option A is false because a Limited Authorization Form does not allow Jehona to process trades in the account without Sokol’s pre-approval; rather, it allows Jehona to accept instructions from a third party authorized by Sokol, such as a spouse or a lawyer. Option C is false because Sokol cannot give Jehona discretionary trading authority, as it is prohibited by NI 31-103 for mutual fund dealers and their representatives. Option D is false because appointing Jehona as his Power of Attorney does not allow Jehona to execute trades without Sokol’s pre-approval; rather, it allows Jehona to act on behalf of Sokol in legal and financial matters, subject to certain conditions and limitations. References: [Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations], [Discretionary Trading | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca], [Limited Authorization Form | IFIC], [Power of Attorney | GetSmarterAboutMoney.ca]

The correct answer is A. Indicates how much an investment’s performance fluctuates around its average historical return.

Standard deviation is a measure of how spread out the data points are from the mean value. It is calculated as the square root of the variance, which is the average of the squared differences from the mean. Standard deviation can be used to assess the volatility or risk of an investment by showing how much the returns deviate from the expected or average return. A higher standard deviation means that the investment has a wider range of possible outcomes, which implies more uncertainty and risk. A lower standard deviation means that the investment has a narrower range of possible outcomes, which implies more stability and consistency.

B. A standard deviation greater than one indicates a higher level of volatility than the market. This statement is incorrect because the standard deviation of an investment is not directly comparable to the standard deviation of the market, unless they have the same mean return. The standard deviation of an investment only measures the absolute variation of the returns, not the relative variation to the market. A better measure of the relative volatility of an investment to the market is beta, which is the ratio of the covariance of the investment and the market to the variance of the market.

C. Measures the systematic risk of an investment relative to a benchmark index. This statement is incorrect because the standard deviation of an investment does not distinguish between the systematic risk and the unsystematic risk. The systematic risk is the risk that affects the entire market or a large segment of the market, such as inflation, interest rates, or political events. The unsystematic risk is the risk that affects a specific investment or a small group of investments, such as management decisions, product quality, or lawsuits. The standard deviation of an investment captures both types of risk, whereas the beta of an investment only captures the systematic risk.

D. Standard deviation is also referred to as beta. This statement is incorrect because standard deviation and beta are different measures of risk. Standard deviation measures the absolute variation of the returns of an investment, whereas beta measures the relative variation of the returns of an investment to the market. Standard deviation is a measure of total risk, whereas beta is a measure of systematic risk.

Market risk, or systematic risk, arises from factors affecting the entire market, such as changes in inflation or interest rates, and cannot be fully eliminated through diversification. The feedback from the document states:

"Once a portfolio becomes well diversified, the only remaining risk to be concerned about is market risk. Market risk is defined as the variability of a stock or a portfolio in relation to the market as a whole. The process of diversification cancels out much firm-specific risk, so market risk is less than the total risk you would calculate if you looked at each stock separately. Market risk is also referred to as systematic risk and arises from such things as inflation, the business cycle, and interest rates."

The statement that is correct about Maalik’s identification requirements is option A. According to Section 7 of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA), registered firms and individuals must report any suspicious transactions or attempted transactions to FINTRAC, which is Canada’s financial intelligence unit that collects, analyzes, and discloses information related to money laundering and terrorist financing activities. A suspicious transaction or attempted transaction is one that there are reasonable grounds to suspect that it is related to a money laundering or terrorist financing offence. Therefore, if Maalik determines that there is anything suspicious about John’s transaction, he must report the matter to his dealer, who must report it to FINTRAC within 30 days of making the determination. The other statements are not correct about Maalik’s identification requirements. Option B is false because Maalik does not need to report John as a PEFP to his dealer; rather, he must take reasonable measures to determine whether John is a PEFP or a family member or close associate of a PEFP, and if so, he must obtain senior management approval before opening an account for John, take enhanced measures to verify John’s identity, and conduct enhanced ongoing monitoring of John’s account activity. Option C is false because Maalik does not need to collect personal information about John and report it to his dealer if John wants to make a large cash deposit; rather, he must verify John’s identity using an original, valid, and current document or information from a reliable source, keep a record of John’s name and address and the date and amount of the deposit, and report any large cash transactions of $10,000 or more in Canadian currency or its equivalent to FINTRAC within 15 days of receiving the cash. Option D is false because Maalik does not need to report the attempt to his dealer if John attempts to make a suspicious deposit; rather, he must report the attempt directly to FINTRAC within 30 days of detecting the suspicion, regardless of whether the transaction was completed or not. References: [FINTRAC - Home], [FINTRAC - Reporting], [FINTRAC - Guideline 2: Suspicious Transactions], [FINTRAC - Guideline 6A: Record Keeping and Client Identification for Financial Entities]

Kiri has correctly fulfilled his suitability obligation by matching the risk-return profile of the fund with the personal circumstances of his client. The Conservative Bond Fund is a low-risk, low-return fund that pays regular interest income to investors. Myrtle’s investment objective is “income”, which means she wants to receive steady income from her investments and preserve her capital. Therefore, Kiri’s recommendation is reasonably suitable for Myrtle in all the circumstances. (Canadian Investment Funds Course, Chapter 2, Section 2.3)

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Chapter 2, Section 2.3: Conflicts of Interest

IFSE Institute: Suitability Obligations1

SFC: Frequently Asked Questions on Compliance with Suitability Obligations2

 Participating preferred shares are a type of preferred shares that give the holder a right to share in the issuer’s net profits over and above the specified dividend rate. This means that participating preferred shareholders may receive additional dividends if the issuer performs well. Iliana owns participating preferred shares in the First Canadian Bank, which means she has a right to share in the bank’s net profits over and above the specified dividend rate. References: Investment Funds in Canada (IFC) | Canadian Securities Institute

Rights of survivorship means that if one account holder dies, their share of the assets automatically transfers to the surviving holder(s).

This feature is available in joint non-registered accounts.

Registered accounts (A) (e.g., RRSP, TFSA) are individual accounts and cannot be opened jointly with rights of survivorship.

Trust accounts (B) follow trust law, not survivorship rules.

Corporate accounts (D) belong to the company, not individuals.

The “Client’s Interest First” standard requires that Dealing Representatives act in the best interest of their clients and place their clients’ interests before their own or their employer’s interests. This means that they must provide clear, accurate, and complete information to their clients about the mutual funds they recommend, including the costs and fees associated with them and how they affect the investment performance. Presenting a fund’s historical performance to anticipate its future return is misleading and does not serve the client’s interest. Using a risk-based approach to select a mutual fund is part of the suitability assessment, but it does not necessarily put the client’s interest first. Accurately documenting the KYC information is important for compliance purposes, but it does not ensure that the recommendation is in the client’s best interest.

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Chapter 8: Suitability and Know Your Client1