Pass the ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Questions and answers with CertsForce

Understanding Behaviorism and Punishment:

Behaviorists like B. F. Skinner argue that punishment temporarily suppresses undesired behaviors rather than eliminating them.

Once the punitive stimulus is removed, the behavior is likely to reappear unless it is replaced with a more desirable behavior through reinforcement.

Analysis of Options:

B. Permanently suppressed:This contradicts the principles of behaviorism, as punishment alone does not permanently modify behavior.

C. Occur more frequently:Punishment typically decreases behavior temporarily.

D. Not affected by punishment:Punishment impacts behavior, but the effect is often temporary.

Conclusion:The most likely outcome is that the behavior will return once the punishment ceases.

Purpose of Fraud Risk Assessment:

The goal is to identify vulnerabilities to fraud and implement preventive measures, not to wait for conclusive evidence of fraud before designating high-risk areas.

Proactive Identification:

High-risk areas are identified based on susceptibility to fraud (e.g., lack of controls, high cash transactions), even if no fraud has been detected. This approach allows organizations to act preemptively.

Improving Fraud Awareness:

Employee education and behavior monitoring are integral components of the assessment process to reduce fraud risks.

Incorrect Assumption in D:

Waiting for conclusive evidence contradicts the proactive nature of fraud risk assessment and undermines its preventative function​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics​​.

Auditor Essentials on fraud prevention and deterrence principles​.

COSO and risk assessment frameworks in internal controls​​.

The COSO definition of internal control is:

“A process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives relating to operations, reporting, and compliance.”

This is the formal and widely accepted COSO definition.

Proactive Fraud Auditing Procedures:

Analytical reviews are effective for identifying large or unusual trends and anomalies, not necessarily small frauds.

Other tools, such as detailed transaction testing, are better suited for uncovering small frauds.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Element of surprise:A key feature of fraud audits.

C. Fraud assessment questioning:Valid as part of the audit process.

D. Management’s intentions:Proactive procedures signal a strong stance against fraud.

Conclusion:Option B is false because analytical reviews are better at detecting significant anomalies rather than small frauds.

The ACFE manual states:

“Employees should be trained to recognize and report signs such as unexplained lifestyle changes or behavioral red flags, and they should be informed that management will be watching for such indicators.”

 Fraud Risk Reduction Objectives:

Inherent fraud risk:The risk present before any controls are applied.

Residual fraud risk:The remaining risk after controls have been implemented.

 Why D is Correct:

The goal of anti-fraud controls is to minimize residual risk to acceptable levels, recognizing that complete elimination of risk is unattainable.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A and C:It is impractical to completely eliminate inherent or residual fraud risks.

B:Residual risk should be lower than inherent risk, but controls aim for significant reduction​

 Criminogenic Nature of Organizations:

Research suggests that organizational culture and pressures can override an individual's personal values, especially when authority figures issue direct orders to engage in unethical behavior.

 Why B is Correct:

Strong personal values do not guarantee resistance to unethical orders, as obedience to authority is a powerful psychological force, as seen in studies like the Milgram experiment​​.

 Implication for Fraud Prevention:

Organizations must establish strong ethical environments to reduce the influence of authority pressure on employees