Pass the VMware VCP-VCF Administrator 2V0-17.25 Questions and answers with CertsForce

TheVCF 9.0 Operations Guide – Alerts and Policiesexplains how alert cycles are calculated:

Wait Cycle: The number of consecutive collection cycles that the symptom must remain true before the alert is triggered.

Cancel Cycle: The number of consecutive collection cycles that the symptom must not be true before the alert is canceled.

Default Collection Interval: VCF Operations collects data every5 minutesby default.

Given the settings:

Wait cycle = 2→ The condition must persist for2 × 5 minutes = 10 minutesbefore the alert triggers.

Cancel cycle = 2→ The condition must clear for2 × 5 minutes = 10 minutesbefore the alert cancels.

Thus, the total elapsed time between the symptom being triggered and the alert being automatically canceled (if unresolved) is10 minutes wait + 10 minutes cancel = 20 minutes.

Other options:

40 minutes (A) assumes a longer interval but is incorrect.

4 minutes (B) and 10 minutes (C) do not align with the default 5-minute cycle × 2 logic.

Therefore, the correct answer is20 minutes.

VCF 9.0 documents two Operations for Logs/Operations models—Simple (Standard)andHigh Availability (Cluster)—and highlight thatSimpleis the minimal footprint option intended for test/dev: “Architecture flexibility: Can be deployed in a Simple or Highly Available Cluster deployment. Recommended deployment is a HA Cluster… Simple deployment is for test/dev environments, it is not for production use cases.”

By contrast, HA/clustered models increase resources to provide redundancy at scale. Since the requirement is thesmallest resource footprint, theSimplemodel is the correct selection. (Stretched/Continuous Availability options are not listed VCF Operations models in this context.)

The vSphere 9.0 Resource Management documentation, included within VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, specifies that Resource Pools are the mechanism to delegate compute resources within a cluster. A resource pool acts as a container of compute resources (CPU and memory) that can be subdivided and assigned to VMs or groups of VMs.

The documentation states:

“Resource pools provide resource isolation, control, and delegation. You can configure reservations, limits, and shares to ensure that mission-critical workloads (such as production VMs) receive guaranteed resources, while development or test workloads consume only available resources.”

This aligns directly with the requirements:

Power on only if resources are available → Achieved via reservations and limits.

Production VMs require guaranteed levels of resources → Enforced using reservations.

Three-tier apps with varying demand → Controlled using shares and limits across multiple resource pools.

Other options are incorrect:

vSphere Availability (A) provides failover, not resource governance.

VCF Operations (B) monitors resource usage but does not allocate or enforce it.

Dynamic Resource Scheduling (D) balances workloads but does not provide delegated, guaranteed allocations per department or application tier.

Thus, the correct feature is vSphere Resource Pools.

TheVCF Operations for Networks (formerly vRNI)enablesApplication Discovery and Network Visibility. According to VCF 9.0: “Operations for Networks provides flow-based application discovery, dependency mapping, and security planning. This allows administrators to visualize application topology and relationships across the VCF fleet.” By contrast, VCF Operations for Logs provides log aggregation, while the Collector provides integration for metrics, not discovery. The vSphere Supervisor enables Kubernetes workloads, not application discovery. Therefore, to achieveService and Application Discovery, administrators must deployVCF Operations for Networks.

Per theVCF 9.0 Automation Provider Management Guide:

Supervisor Activation: “Kubernetes-based workloads require Supervisor to be enabled in the Management Domain before deploying organizations.”

Region Configuration: “Organizations for All Applications must be deployed into a preconfigured Region, defined in the Provider Management Portal.”NSX Federation (D) is optional for multi-site deployments. Supervisor is not activated in workload domains (B) but centrally in the management domain. VMware Kubernetes Service (E) is enabled per tenant but not required before Organization creation. Thus, correct prerequisites areA and C.

The vSphere 9.0 Resource Management Guide describes Enhanced vMotion Compatibility (EVC) as the mechanism that masks CPU instruction set differences across ESXi hosts, presenting a consistent baseline to VMs.

The documentation states:

“EVC ensures vMotion compatibility across hosts with different CPU generations by exposing a uniform set of CPU features to all virtual machines in the cluster.”

vSphere Fault Tolerance (A): Provides continuous availability for individual VMs but does not address CPU instruction compatibility.

vSphere Availability (B): Refers to HA (High Availability) which handles VM failover, not CPU feature alignment.

Host Affinity Rules (C): Control placement of VMs but cannot solve compatibility between mixed CPU generations.

Enhanced vMotion Compatibility (D): Specifically addresses the requirement for vMotion and DRS across mixed CPU generations, making it the correct answer.

TheVCF Automation Provider Networking Guidestates:

“Before you can configure Provider Networking, an active Tier-0 (T0) Gateway must be created in NSX Manager and associated with the Provider region.”

This gateway provides external routing and forms the foundation for VPC and tenant networking. Creating a T0 at the Organization level (A) is not correct—organizations consume Provider networking but do not create T0s. vDS in Provider Management (C) or vCenter (D) is unrelated to NSX-based provider networking.

Thus, the required prerequisite is:Create a T0 Gateway in NSX Manager.

VCF provides integrated automation and orchestration for Day 0–2 operations, including networking: VCF is a “full-stack IaaS” with “automation and orchestration to simplify Day 0, Day 1, and Day 2 tasks.” VCF supports modern apps: users can provision “VMs” and “Kubernetes workloads” from self-service services, proving both VM and container support. Multi-tenancy with strong isolation is native: Organizations are “secure and isolated” boundaries; All Apps organizations run “virtual machines (VMs), Kubernetes… multiple tenants with secure infrastructure isolation.”

Incorrect choices: VCF is not limited to vSAN only (supports VMFS/NFS/CNS as documented elsewhere) and does not rely on manual scalability—automation is core. Compliance is provided within the private cloud, not only by a CSP.