Pass the Snowflake SnowPro Advanced: Administrator ADA-C01 Questions and answers with CertsForce

According to the Replication considerations documentation, the Time Travel retention period for a secondary database can be different from the primary database. The retention period can be set at the database, schema, or table level using the DATA_RETENTION_TIME_IN_DAYS parameter. Therefore, to extend the Time Travel retention policy to 60 days on the secondary database only, the best option is to set the data retention policy on the secondary database to 60 days using the ALTER DATABASE command. The other options are incorrect because:

•B. Setting the data retention policy on the schemas in the secondary database to 60 days will not affect the database-level retention period, which will remain at 30 days. The most specific setting overrides the more general ones, so the schema-level setting will apply to the tables in the schema, but not to the database itself.

•C. Setting the data retention policy on the primary database to 30 days and the schemas to 60 days will not affect the secondary database, which will have its own retention period. The replication process does not copy the retention period settings from the primary to the secondary database, so they can be configured independently.

•D. Setting the data retention policy on the primary database to 60 days will not affect the secondary database, which will have its own retention period. The replication process does not copy the retention period settings from the primary to the secondary database, so they can be configured independently.

According to the GRANT OWNERSHIP documentation, the ownership privilege grants full control over the table and can only be held by one role at a time. However, the current owner can also grant the ownership privilege to another role, which transfers the ownership to the new role. In this case, the SECURITYADMIN role granted the ownership privilege on future tables in the PROD.WORKING schema to the PROD_WORKING_OWNER role. This means that any table created in that schema after the grant statement will be owned by the PROD_WORKING_OWNER role. Therefore, the PROD_WORKING_OWNER role can alter or drop table XYZ, which was created by the ACCOUNTADMIN role in the PROD.WORKING schema. Additionally, the ACCOUNTADMIN role can also alter or drop table XYZ, because it is the top-level role that has all privileges on all objects in the account. Furthermore, the SYSADMIN role can also alter or drop table XYZ, because it was granted the PROD_WORKING_OWNER role by the SECURITYADMIN role. The SYSADMIN role can activate the PROD_WORKING_OWNER role and inherit its privileges, including the ownership privilege on table XYZ. The SECURITYADMIN role cannot alter or drop table XYZ, because it does not have the ownership privilege on the table, nor does it have the PROD_WORKING_OWNER role.

According to the Using Persisted Query Results documentation, the RESULT_SCAN function allows you to query the result set of a previous command as if it were a table. This can improve the performance of the second query by avoiding reading the same data from micro-partitions again. The other actions do not provide optimal performance for the second query because:

•Assigning additional clusters to the virtual warehouse does not affect the data access speed, but only the query execution speed. It also increases the cost of the warehouse.

•Increasing the STATEMENT_TIMEOUT_IN_SECONDS parameter in the session does not improve the performance of the query, but only allows it to run longer before timing out. It also increases the risk of resource contention and deadlock.

•Preventing the virtual warehouse from suspending between the running of the first and second queries does not guarantee that the data will be cached in memory, as Snowflake uses a least recently used (LRU) cache eviction policy. It also increases the cost of the warehouse.

https://docs.snowflake.com/en/user-guide/querying-persisted-results

Option B is the correct answer because it follows the steps described in the Snowflake documentation for sharing data from multiple databases using secure views. The data provider needs to grant the REFERENCE_USAGE privilege on each database that contains objects referenced by the secure view, and the USAGE privilege only on the database where the secure view is created. Option A is incorrect because it grants the USAGE privilege instead of the REFERENCE_USAGE privilege. Option C is incorrect because it grants the REFERENCE_USAGE privilege to a database role, which is not supported. Option D is incorrectbecause it grants the REFERENCE_USAGE privilege on the wrong database.

According to the Working with Secure Views documentation, secure views are designed to limit access to sensitive data that should not be exposed to all users of the underlying table(s). When sharing secure views with another account, the view definition must include a function that returns the identity of the user who is querying the view, such as CURRENT_USER, CURRENT_ROLE, or CURRENT_ACCOUNT. These functions can be used to filter the rows in the base table based on the user’s identity. For example, a secure view can use the CURRENT_USER function to compare the user name with a column in the base table that contains the authorized user names. Only the rows that match the user name will be returned by the view. The CURRENT_CLIENT function is not suitable for this purpose, because it returns the IP address of the client that is connected to Snowflake, which is not related to the user’s identity.

According to the Snowflake documentation1, Snowflake supports SCIM 2.0 to integrate Snowflake with Okta and Microsoft Azure AD, which both function as identity providers. Snowflake also supports identity providers that are neither Okta nor Microsoft Azure (i.e. Custom). Therefore, the SCIM integration types that are supported in Snowflake are Okta, Custom, and Azure AD. Option A is incorrect because Amazon Web Services (AWS) is not a SCIM identity provider. Option B is incorrect because Google Cloud Platform (GCP) is not a SCIM identity provider. Option F is incorrect because Duo Security Provisioning Connector is not a SCIM identity provider.

According to the Snowflake documentation1, when an object in a schema is cloned, any future grants defined for this object type in the schema are applied to the cloned object unless the COPY GRANTS option is specified in the CREATE statement for the clone operation. However, some objects may still reference the source object or external objects after cloning, which may cause issues with access or functionality. These objects include:

•Sequences: If a table column references a sequence that generates default values, the cloned table may reference the source or cloned sequence, depending on where the sequence is defined. To avoid conflicts, the sequence reference should be re-pointed to the desired sequence using the ALTER TABLE command2.

•Storage integrations: If a stage or a table references a storage integration, the cloned object may still reference the source storage integration, which may not be accessible or valid in the new environment. To avoid errors, the storage integration reference should be re-pointed to the desired storage integration using the ALTER STAGE or ALTER TABLE command34.

•Views, secure views, and materialized views: If a view references another view or table, the cloned view may still reference the source object, which may not be accessible or valid in the new environment. To avoid errors, the view reference should be re-pointed to the desired object using the CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW command5.

1: Cloning Considerations | Snowflake Documentation 2: [ALTER TABLE | Snowflake Documentation] 3: [ALTER STAGE | Snowflake Documentation] 4: [ALTER TABLE | Snowflake Documentation] 5: [CREATE VIEW | Snowflake Documentation]

According to the Snowflake documentation1, when a role is dropped, ownership of all objects owned by the dropped role is transferred to the role that is directly above the dropped role in the role hierarchy. This is to ensure that there is always a single owner for each object in the system.

1: Drop Role | Snowflake Documentation

According to the Snowflake documentation1, organizations are a feature that allows linking the accounts owned by a business entity, simplifying account management and billing, replication and failover, data sharing, and other account administration tasks. Some of the benefits of using organizations are:

•Administrators can monitor and understand usage across all accounts in the organization using the ORGANIZATION_USAGE schema, which provides historical usage data for all accounts in the organization via views in a shared database named SNOWFLAKE2. This can help to optimize costs and performance across the organization.

•Administrators have the ability to create accounts in any available cloud provider or region using the CREATE ACCOUNT command, which allows specifying the cloud platform and region for the new account3. This can help to meet the business needs and compliance requirements of the organization.

Option A is incorrect because administrators cannot change Snowflake account editions on-demand based on need, but rather have to contact Snowflake Support to request an edition change4. Option C is incorrect because administrators cannot simplify data movement across all accounts within the organization, but rather have to enable account database replication for both the source and target accounts, and use the ALTER DATABASE … ENABLE REPLICATION TO ACCOUNTS command to promote a local database to serve as the primary database and enable replication to the target accounts5. Option D is incorrect because user administration is not simplified across all accounts within the organization, but rather requires creating and managing users, roles, and privileges for each account separately, unless using a federated authentication method such as SSO or SCIM.

According to the Snowflake documentation1, resource monitors are a feature that helps you manage and control Snowflake costs by monitoring and setting limits on your compute resources. Resource monitors do not consume any credits or add any load to the virtual warehouses they monitor1. Resource monitors can also have multiple triggers that specify different actions (such as suspending or notifying) when certain percentages of the credit quota are reached2. Resource monitors can be applied to either the entire account or a specific set of individual warehouses1. The other options are not benefits of resource monitors. The cost of running a resource monitor is negligible, not 10% of a credit3. Multiple resource monitors cannot be applied to a single virtual warehouse; only one resource monitor can be assigned to a warehouse at a time2. Resource monitor governance is not tightly controlled; account administrators can enable users with other roles to view and modify resource monitors using SQL2.