Pass the SAP SAP Certified Application Associate C_IBP_2502 Questions and answers with CertsForce

SAP IBP for Demand enhances demand planning with advanced features, per SAP IBP’s demand module documentation.

Option A: Automated, exception-based processingThis is correct. Automated forecasting with exception handling (e.g., alerts for outliers) is a core capability, per SAP IBP’s demand planning features.

Option B: Statistical analysis using the predictive analytics toolsThis is incorrect. Predictive analytics (e.g., machine learning) is available via SAP HANA integration, not a native IBP Demand tool.

Option C: Determination of coefficient of variation (CV)This is correct. CV (variability measure) is calculated in ABC/XYZ segmentation and demand analysis, a standard feature, per SAP IBP’s documentation.

Option D: Classifying demand into zonesThis is incorrect. "Zones" is not a standard demand classification in SAP IBP; ABC/XYZ segmentation is used instead.

Option E: Embedded, on-the-fly demand analyticsThis is correct. Real-time analytics (e.g., in Excel or Planner Workspaces) provide instant demand insights, per SAP IBP’s demand capabilities.

Thus, A, C, and E are key capabilities, per SAP IBP’s official demand planning scope.

The S&OP Operator Profiles app in SAP IBP configures planning algorithms (e.g., heuristics, optimizer). The Time-Series-Based Supply Optimizer has unique settings reflecting its optimization approach.

Option A: DiscretizationThis is correct. Discretization (e.g., binary or integer variables for lot sizes) is specific to the optimizer, enabling discrete decisions (e.g., full truckloads), a feature not in heuristics, per SAP IBP’s optimizer documentation.

Option B: Time profile levelThis is incorrect. Time profile level applies to all time-series planning (heuristics and optimizer), not unique to the optimizer.

Option C: Global cost factorsThis is correct. The optimizer uses global cost factors (e.g., non-delivery, inventory holding costs) to balance trade-offs across the network, a unique setting compared to heuristics, per SAP IBP’s configuration guides.

Option D: Processing modeThis is incorrect. Processing mode (e.g., batch vs. interactive) is a general job setting, not algorithm-specific to the optimizer.

Thus, A and C are unique settings for the Time-Series-Based Supply Optimizer, per SAP IBP’s official documentation.

SAP IBP for Sales and Operations Planning (S&OP) unifies demand, supply, and inventory processes, with key data reviewed in the S&OP cycle, per SAP IBP’s S&OP documentation.

Option A: Global Demand PlanThis is incorrect. "Global Demand Plan" is not a standard term in SAP IBP S&OP; it’s typically "Consensus Demand Plan" after collaboration.

Option B: Constrained Demand PlanThis is incorrect. Constrained demand is more relevant to supply planning or response, not the unified S&OP review process.

Option C: Inventory PlanThis is correct. The Inventory Plan (e.g., safety stock, target inventory) is reviewed in S&OP to ensure alignment with demand and supply, a key unified process, per SAP IBP’s documentation.

Option D: Consensus Demand PlanThis is correct. The Consensus Demand Plan, finalized after S&OP collaboration, is a central data point reviewed to balance supply and inventory, per SAP IBP’s S&OP workflow.

Thus, C and D are commonly reviewed in S&OP, per SAP IBP’s official processes.

The Copy Operator in SAP IBP transfers data between key figures, supporting multiple source-target pairs in one run. Its behavior is defined by SAP IBP’s data management rules.

Option A: Copying multiple key figures can be processed sequentiallyThis is correct. When multiple pairs are defined, the Copy Operator processes them sequentially within the job, ensuring dependencies are respected, per SAP IBP’s operator documentation.

Option B: Copying multiple key figures on different planning levels is not possibleThis is incorrect. The Copy Operator supports different planning levels (e.g., PERPROD to PERPRODLOC), adjusting aggregation/disaggregation as needed.

Option C: Necessary source key figures values are disaggregatedThis is incorrect. Source key figures are copied as-is; disaggregation occurs on the target side if required, not the source.

Option D: Necessary target key figures values are disaggregatedThis is correct. If the target key figure’s planning level is more detailed than the source, SAP IBP disaggregates values (e.g., using proportional factors), a standard behavior, per documentation.

Thus, A and D are key considerations for the Copy Operator, per SAP IBP’s official rules.

Master data types in SAP IBP define planning objects, with "Component" typically referring to a specific type like Production Source Item Component, per SAP IBP’s documentation.

Option A: Virtual master data typeThis is incorrect. Virtual types are temporary or derived, not standard for components.

Option B: Compound Master Data TypeThis is incorrect. Compound types (e.g., SOURCECUSTOMER) combine multiple simple types, not specifically "Component."

Option C: Reference Master Data TypeThis is correct. The Component master data type (e.g., in Production Source Item) is a Reference type, linking to a Product, per SAP IBP’s master data hierarchy (e.g., referencing Product ID).

Option D: External Master Data TypeThis is incorrect. External types are sourced externally, not a fit for Component.

Thus, C is the correct type, per SAP IBP’s official master data definitions.

In SAP IBP, master data types are classified as simple (standalone) or compound (combining multiple simple types). Compound master data types link related entities (e.g., source and target) and are critical for supply and inventory planning to define relationships.

Option A: SOURCEPRODUCTIONThis is incorrect. SOURCEPRODUCTION is not a standard compound master data type in SAP IBP. Production relationships are modeled via Production Source of Supply (e.g., Production Source Header/Item), not a compound type named SOURCEPRODUCTION.

Option B: SOURCECUSTOMERThis is correct. SOURCECUSTOMER is a compound master data type combining Source ID (e.g., Location or Product) and Customer ID. It defines sourcing relationships (e.g., which customers are served from which sources) and is used in supply and inventory planning to allocate demand.

Option C: SOURCELOCATIONThis is correct. SOURCELOCATION is a compound master data type linking Source Location and Target Location (e.g., via Transportation Lane). It’s essential for modeling supply chain networks in inventory and supply planning.

Option D: SOURCECUSTGROUPThis is incorrect. There’s no standard compound master data type called SOURCECUSTGROUP in SAP IBP. Customer groups might be attributes, but they don’t form a compound type.

Thus, B and C (SOURCECUSTOMER, SOURCELOCATION) are compound master data types inSAP IBP, as per official master data configuration documentation.

The Supply Optimizer in SAP IBP models outsourced manufacturers as Locations with production capacity, optimizing costs across the network, per SAP IBP’s supply planning documentation.

Option A: Model relative production costs across internal locations and outsourced manufacturing locationsThis is correct. The optimizer requires cost data (e.g., production costs per unit) for internal and outsourced locations to decide where to produce, a key prerequisite, per SAP IBP’s cost optimization rules.

Option B: Use production lead times and offsets to manage components at the outsourced manufacturing locationThis is incorrect. Lead times and offsets are used, but they’re not a prerequisite specific to capacity modeling; they’re general planning inputs.

Option C: Ensure that the outsourced manufacturing locations have a separate subnetworkThis is incorrect. Subnetworks optimize runtime, but they’re not required for modeling outsourced capacity; the optimizer works across one network.

Option D: Model target inventory and stocks at the outsourced manufacturing locationThis is incorrect. Inventory targets are optional and not a prerequisite for capacity modeling in the optimizer.

Thus, A is the prerequisite, per SAP IBP’s official optimizer requirements.

This scenario involves optimizing resource use with a minimum threshold, potentially overproducing, in SAP IBP’s supply planning, per its documentation.

Option A: Excess stock can be generated and will need to be staged in an overflow warehouseThis is correct. Overproduction to meet minimum use generates excess stock, requiring storage (e.g., overflow warehouse), a practical outcome, per SAP IBP’s planning behavior.

Option B: Capacity leveling will be possible for production and storage resourcesThis is incorrect. Capacity leveling (smoothing production) is a PP/DS feature, not standard in IBP’s time-series planning.

Option C: Balance can be achieved between excessive prebuild and minimum use by incorporating violation costsThis is correct. The Supply Optimizer can balance minimum utilization (via costs) and excess production (via inventory costs), a supported solution, per SAP IBP’s optimization features.

Option D: Minimum capacity utilization will result in pull productionThis is incorrect. Pull production (demand-driven) contradicts producing beyond demand; this scenario aligns with push logic.

Thus, A and C apply, per SAP IBP’s official supply planning capabilities.

A successful consistency check in SAP IBP ensures the planning area’s configuration is valid, per SAP IBP’s documentation.

Option A: Configure at least one calculated key figure for the planning areaThis is incorrect. Calculated key figures are optional; a planning area can function with only stored key figures.

Option B: Specify a planning horizon in the planning area for each level of the assigned time profileThis is correct. The planning horizon (e.g., past/future periods) must align with the time profile levels (e.g., week, month) for data consistency, a prerequisite, per SAP IBP’s setup.

Option C: Configure at most two input key figures on the same planning level in a key figure calculationThis is incorrect. There’s no such limit; calculations can use multiple inputs, depending on complexity.

Option D: Assign the compound master data type and its component master data typesThis is correct. Compound types (e.g., SOURCECUSTOMER) and their components (e.g., Customer, Location) must be assigned for network consistency, per SAP IBP’s documentation.

Thus, B and D are prerequisites, per SAP IBP’s official consistency check requirements.

The Planner Workspaces app in SAP IBP is a Fiori-based UI that integrates planning tools, analytics, and collaboration features for supply chain planners.

Option A: It supports simulating the effect of the changesThis is incorrect. While simulation is a feature in SAP IBP (e.g., via versions or scenarios in Excel), Planner Workspaces focuses on visualization and navigation, not direct simulation execution. Simulation occurs in other apps like Excel or Manage Scenarios.

Option B: It supports favorites created in SAP IBP, add-in for Microsoft ExcelThis is correct. Planner Workspaces integrates with the Excel add-in, allowing users to access their Excel favorites (e.g., planning views) directly within the workspace. This enhances usability by linking preferred tools, as per SAP IBP’s documentation on Planner Workspaces.

Option C: It supports embedding analytic stories as a workspace componentThis is correct. Analytic stories (created in the Manage Analytics Stories app) can be embedded in Planner Workspaces, providing charts and insights alongside planning data. This is a key visualization feature, per SAP IBP’s UI capabilities.

Option D: It supports sharing with other users or user groupsThis is incorrect. Sharing is available in Excel (e.g., templates) or analytics apps, but Planner Workspaces doesn’t have a native sharing function for workspaces themselves. Collaboration occurs via other mechanisms.

Thus, B and C are accurate capabilities of Planner Workspaces, aligning with SAP IBP’s official feature set.