Pass the SAP SAP Certified Associate C_ABAPD_2507 Questions and answers with CertsForce

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

Sorted tables can be declared with unique keys (ensuring no duplicates) or with non-unique keys (allowing duplicates).

Hashed tables only allow unique keys.

Standard tables allow non-unique keys only.

Thus, sorted internal tables are the only type that can be configured with both unique and non-unique keys.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP Dictionary and ABAP Cloud Programming Guide – Internal Table Types.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In SAP HANA, the choice of storage type and load unit depends on access patterns, table size, and usage frequency.

Here’s how each part applies:

A. "Storage Type" to "Row Store" – This is correct.Since:

The table is accessed by only one program.

The program runs rarely.

The access pattern is row-oriented (SELECT SINGLE with filters).

Row store is more suitable for rare access with small result sets and no aggregation.

D. "Load Unit" to "Page Loadable" – This is correct.Since the program runs infrequently, loading the entire column into memory (column loadable) is not efficient. Page-loadable units load only required parts into memory on demand, which reduces memory footprint.

Incorrect options:

B. "Storage Type" to "Column Store" – Incorrect here. Column store is ideal for frequent reads, aggregations, or analytics, not for rarely accessed tables with simple lookups.

C. "Load Unit" to "Column Loadable" – Also not optimal for rarely accessed data. Column loadable preloads entire columns into memory, which is memory-intensive and unnecessary in this case.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In ABAP Cloud/RAP examples, test classes are created inside the development object (e.g., inside the behavior implementation) and are marked FOR TESTING—these are local classes (they live in the program/class include, not as separate global repository classes). The guides show creating test classes under the Test Classes tab and referencing the Local Types section of the implementation (friends etc.), i.e., local to the program/object.

This contrasts with global classes that exist as standalone repository objects; the RAP test patterns explicitly model the former (local) for unit tests within the object’s context.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

A DATS field is stored as YYYYMMDD.

Option A: substring( flight_date, 5, 2 ) → Extracts characters 5–6 → correct month.

Option B: right( left( flight_date, 6 ), 2 ) → Takes first 6 chars YYYYMM, then last 2 → correct month.

Option C: Wrong, extracts last 2 chars of MMDD, results in day not month.

Option D: Wrong, starts at 4 → gives YM instead of MM.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP CDS Development Guide – String Functions in CDS.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

Encapsulation in ABAP OO and ABAP Cloud ensures that internal object details are hidden from outside consumers.

A. Attributes can be changed through public methods → ✅ Correct, because controlled access is provided through getter/setter or other methods.

B. Attributes can be changed by the client program directly → ❌ Incorrect, this violates encapsulation.

C. Attributes cannot be changed → ❌ Incorrect, they can be changed, but only via allowed mechanisms.

D. Attributes can only be changed by the class itself → ✅ Correct, ensuring business logic consistency.

This aligns with RAP behavior definitions (BDEF) where internal attributes are encapsulated and only manipulated through behavior implementation methods.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP Objects Programming Guide – Encapsulation Principles.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Multi-column internal tables are defined using a structured row type, meaning each row is defined by a structure (either defined inline or as a global structure type in the Dictionary).

Option B is correct because it describes how internal tables with multiple fields are built using structured rows.

Option A is incorrect because the row type must be complete and consistent.

Option C is incorrect because nested components are not a requirement.

Option D is misleading. Though “complete data type” may sound correct, it lacks specificity. The correct technical description is that the row type is a structure.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

In ABAP, object references must be declared with TYPE REF TO <class>.

Option D is correct: DATA lo_vehicle TYPE REF TO cl_vehicle. creates a reference variable.

Option A → Incorrect, TYPES defines a type, not a variable.

Option B → Syntax error, correct keyword is REF TO, not REF OF.

Option C → Invalid, LIKE REF is not supported in ABAP.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP Objects Programming Guide – Reference Variable Declarations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

RAP and ABAP Cloud emphasize expression-based coding, and REDUCE is a key reduction expression. The code above defines an accumulator (h_structure_variable) and iterates over an internal table (source_itab) with FOR … IN …, so a loop over the source table is created (D). In each iteration, fields are accumulated and, when the expression finishes, the final accumulator value is returned and assigned to structure_variable. With compatible structured types, components are copied name-by-name (C).

In ABAP Cloud, the language is explicitly described as “aligned and extended to support RAP … The application developer uses typed APIs … and benefits from static code checks.” This underpins the use of typed, expression-based constructs like REDUCE for safe, declarative logic.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

To redefine a component in a subclass:

The component (method) in the superclass must be defined with the FOR REDEFINITION addition.

In the subclass, you use the REDEFINITION clause in the method declaration and implement the method in the subclass to override the superclass behavior.

Thus:

Option A is correct because the method declaration in sub1 must include the REDEFINITION addition.

Option D is correct because the actual redefined method implementation must be provided in the subclass sub1.

Option B is incorrect because the component is not re-implemented in the superclass.

Option C is incorrect because REDEFINITION is not added in the superclass, but FOR REDEFINITION is.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

The ABAP DATA statement declares a variable with an assigned type.

A. Private type in the same class (ZCL_CLASS_A) → ✅ Allowed. A class can use its own local type definitions, declared using TYPES.

B. Domain from ABAP Dictionary → ❌ Not allowed directly. Domains define technical attributes but cannot be referenced directly in DATA; they must be wrapped in a data element.

C. Type defined privately in another class → ❌ Not accessible, since private definitions are encapsulated.

D. Data element from ABAP Dictionary → ✅ Allowed, because data elements are global dictionary objects.

This follows ABAP Cloud extensibility rules, ensuring encapsulation and strict typing.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP Dictionary Development Guide, ABAP Cloud Back-End Developer Learning Material (Variable Typing and Encapsulation).