Pass the OMG OMG Certification OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions and answers with CertsForce

A stereotype in UML is a powerful extension mechanism that allows developers to tailor UML models for particular domains or platforms. Stereotypes can adapt UML model elements by adding constraints, changing notation, and adding attributes and operations. However, they cannot remove existing constraints from a model element12.

Notation Change (A): Stereotypes can indeed change the notation of a model element to make it more expressive or domain-specific. For example, a stereotype could be used to visually distinguish between different kinds of classes in a class diagram1.

Adding Constraints (B): Stereotypes can add new constraints to a model element to specify additional rules or requirements that are not defined by the standard UML1.

Removing Constraints ©: This is not a capability of stereotypes. Constraints define rules that must be followed, and once they are part of a model element, they cannot be removed by a stereotype. Instead, they are an intrinsic part of the model’s definition1.

Adding Attributes and Operations (D): Stereotypes can be used to add attributes and operations to a model element, which allows for the specification of additional properties or behaviors that are not part of the standard UML metamodel1.

In summary, while stereotypes are versatile and can extend the capabilities of UML model elements in various ways, they do not have the ability to remove constraints that are already applied to those elements. This is because constraints are consideredfundamental rules that govern the integrity of the model, and removing them would potentially violate the model’s correctness or completeness1.

For question number 50, the correct answer is C: Control tokens are offered on the outgoing Control Flows of the ExceptionHandler. According to the UML 2.5 specification, when an Exception Handler completes its execution, it does not halt the execution of the thread or retain control tokens internally; instead, it passes control tokens along the outgoing Control Flows. This behavior allows the activity to continue processing other behaviors or activities, based on the exception handling outcome.

References:

UML 2.5 Specification: Provides a detailed description of the behavior of Exception Handlers within activity diagrams, including how control tokens are managed upon the completion of an exception handling sequence.

In UML, modeling individual things (such as instances) involves making statements about them. Here are the details for each option:

A. A UML Model can contain individual things (e.g. Instances) UML does not prescribe the level of detail to be used in the description.

This statement is partially correct. UML models can indeed contain individual things (instances), but the level of detail is not explicitly prescribed by UML. However, the statement does not cover the possibility of incomplete or imprecise information.

B. A UML Model can contain statements about individual things If a thing is an instance of a Classifier, these statements must be consistent (all mandatory Properties must be defined, all Constraints must be satisfied).

While it is true that a UML model can contain statements about individual things (instances), the requirement for consistency (mandatory properties and constraints) is not explicitly mentioned in UML. Therefore, this option is not entirely accurate.

C. A UML Model can contain statements about individual things These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, and abstract, but not wrong.

This statement is also partially correct. UML allows for incomplete, imprecise, and abstract statements about individual things. However, it does not guarantee that these statements cannot be wrong.

D. A UML Model can contain statements about individual things. These statements can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, may turn out to be wrong, or even be asserted as counterfactual.

This option provides a more accurate representation. UML allows for statements about individual things that can be incomplete, imprecise, abstract, and even potentially incorrect. It acknowledges the uncertainty and variability in modeling individual things.

E. A UML Model can only contain statements about sets of individual things (e.g. Classifiers).

This statement is incorrect. UML models can contain statements about both individual things (instances) and sets of things (classifiers).

References:

UML 2.5.1 Specification

While the UML specification does not explicitly state the options, it provides the foundation for UML modeling principles and allows for flexibility in expressing statements about individual things.

Remember that UML is a modeling language, and its primary purpose is to capture and communicate information about systems and their components. The level of detail, precision, and correctness can vary based on the modeling context and the specific use case. Therefore, option D best reflects the UML approach to modeling individual things.

Please note that the information provided here is based on UML 2.5.1, and it’s essential to consult the official UML specification for the most accurate and up-to-date details.

In UML, operations can have preconditions defined, which are constraints that must be true before the operation is invoked. When an operation is redefined in a subclass, it is possible to add new preconditions or alter existing ones. Redefining an operation does not typically allow for changes to its scope or the addition of templates, but the preconditions may be expanded to reflect the semantics of the subclass. This is in line with the behavioral specification of operations in UML, where preconditions are part of the behavioral contract of an operation, as described in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification.

In UML, profiles are mechanisms to extend the UML for a specific domain or purpose. The UML specification allows for one profile to reuse or import elements from another profile. This enables modularity and encourages reusability of profile elements across different domains. Additionally, one profile may extend the stereotypes or metaclasses defined in another profile, which allows for the creation of layered profiles where each layer adds its own specificities. This is a common practice in software and systems modeling to cater to different aspects of a system within separate profiles, which are then integrated to form a comprehensive model. The capability to reuse and extend profiles is defined in the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which gives guidelines on how to define and use profiles within UML.

In UML, combined fragments are used to model complex sequence flows by grouping a set of interactions together. Each type of combined fragment has a different semantic use.

The 'assert' combined fragment specifies that the sequence of events inside the fragment must occur exactly as shown, with no deviations or alternatives. This implies that all possible valid traces in the sequence are exactly those specified within the 'assert' fragment; there are no optional or alternative flows.

References include:

UML 2.5 Specification (formal/2017-12-05), specifically the section on Combined Fragments and their semantics.

UML Sequence Diagrams: Overview of Graphical Notation, which discusses the purpose of different combined fragments.

To orchestrate multiple actions within UML, a modeler should use StructuredActivityNodes:

A.Extending Behavior and adding desired Actions is not specifically about coordinating multiple actions; it's about defining new behaviors.

B.Correct. StructuredActivityNodes are a part of UML that provides a mechanism to group a set of actions together and manage the data flows between them, thus coordinating the actions.

C.Using the standard Action and adding desired tag values does not inherently coordinate actions.

D.Extending Action and specifying constraints to be relaxed or removed does not directly relate to coordinating other actions.

References:

UML Specification: Activities section, which describes the use of StructuredActivityNodes.

The use of StructuredActivityNodes for coordinating actions is elaborated in the UML 2.5 Documentation under Activity Diagrams.

The MOF capability that supports the correlation of model elements across model transformations, where both the source and target models may be subject to change, is known as Federation1. Federation allows for the integration of different models, ensuring that changes in one model can be reflected in another, thus maintaining consistency across transformations.

In UML, the «bind» relationship is used to specify that a class is a template instantiation of a template class, where actual parameters are bound to the formal parameters of the template class1. However, in the case of the relationship between a concrete class like Vector and an abstract class like AbstractList, the correct relationship should be Generalization, not «bind».

Generalization is a taxonomic relationship between a more general classifier and a more specific classifier. Each instance of the specific classifier is also an instance of the general classifier1. Thus, Vector being a concrete implementation of AbstractList, should inherit from AbstractList, which is correctly represented by a Generalization relationship in UML.

The other options can be evaluated as follows:

Option A: The upper limit for the size of PhontyQueue is a design decision that should be based on the requirements and use cases of the application. It is not inherently incorrect in UML to have a specific upper limit.

Option C: The Generalization relationship is correctly used between PriorityQueue and AbstractQueue as it represents inheritance in UML.

Option D: While it is true that template parameters are typically defined at the top of the hierarchy, the statement is too absolute. In UML, template parameters can be added to specialized classes, but it depends on the specific design and requirements. Therefore, without additional context, this statement cannot be deemed universally valid.

In conclusion, the most applicable and valid review comment is option B, which correctly identifies the misuse of the «bind» relationship in the context of the class diagram provided.

A FunctionBehavior in UML is a specialized form of behavior that specifies a function that, when executed, yields results influenced only by its input arguments and its internal attributes, without any side effects (e.g., altering global variables or I/O operations). This makes it stateless. Among the options provided:

Ainvolves I/O operations which are not covered under FunctionBehavior as it implies side effects.

Bdeals with environmental inputs and actuator control, not just function computation.

Ccould be considered but implies a state change which again might involve side effects, depending on the implementation.

Dpurely involves calculation based on input parameters, which fits the definition of FunctionBehavior perfectly, as it is a stateless computation.

Eis incorrect because UML indeed includes the concept of FunctionBehavior.

References:

UML Specification, Section on Behaviors

Further details on FunctionBehaviors can be found in the UML 2.5 Documentation under the Classification and Behaviors sections.