An administrator is managing a Nutanix Files instance at a dark site. The administrator has been tasked to configure a solution to alert the security team when more than 500 files are renamed hourly. Which configuration should be applied?
Set up Data Management Protection in Files Manager
Define an anomaly rule in File Analytics
Configure Nutanix Data Lens ransomware protection
Add MMC Snap-In for Nutanix Files
To alert the security team when more than 500 files are renamed hourly on a Nutanix Files instance at a dark site, the administrator shoulddefine an anomaly rule in File Analytics. Nutanix File Analytics is a monitoring and analytics tool for Nutanix Files that provides visibility into file share activities, including file operations like renames. Anomaly rules allow administrators to detect unusual activities and configure alerts, such as email notifications, for specific thresholds.
TheNutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)course states, “File Analytics enables administrators to define anomaly rules to monitor file activities, such as file renames, and set thresholds for alerts, making it ideal for detecting unusual behavior like mass file renaming.” The administrator can create an anomaly rule to track file rename operations and set a threshold of more than 500 renames per hour, triggering an email alert to the security team when this condition is met. This functionality works in a dark site environment, as File Analytics operates locally within the Nutanix cluster and does not require Internet access.
TheNutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)study guide further elaborates that “anomaly rules in File Analytics can be configured to monitor specific file operations, such as renames, with customizable thresholds and notification settings, ensuring timely alerts for potential security issues.” This makes File Analytics the best tool for the task, as it provides granular control over monitoring and alerting for file activities.
The other options are incorrect:
Set up Data Management Protection in Files Manager: Data Management Protection is not a feature of Nutanix Files; it may refer to backup or replication features, which do not address file rename monitoring.
Configure Nutanix Data Lens ransomware protection: Nutanix Data Lens focuses on data lifecycle management and tiering, not real-time monitoring of file operations like renames. While it has some ransomware detection capabilities, it is not designed for specific thresholds like 500 file renames per hour and requires Internet access, which is unavailable in a dark site.
Add MMC Snap-In for Nutanix Files: The MMC (Microsoft Management Console) Snap-In is used for managing Nutanix Files from a Windows system but does not provide monitoring or alerting capabilities for file rename operations.
The NUSA course documentation highlights that “File Analytics anomaly rules are the recommended solution for monitoring file operations like mass renames, providing customizable thresholds and alerts even in dark site environments.”
An administrator is tasked with upgrading Objects Manager to the latest release that came out earlier in the week. The administrator has navigated to the LCM page in Prism Central and does not see the latest version of Objects Manager as an available upgrade. What is the likely reason the administrator does not see the current release of Objects Manager as an available upgrade?
An LCM inventory has not been performed
The administrator is logged in as local admin rather than a domain admin
The administrator needs to perform the upgrade through Prism Element
Prism Central needs to be scaled out
The administrator is attempting to upgrade Objects Manager (a component of Nutanix Objects) using Prism Central’s Lifecycle Manager (LCM) but does not see the latest version, which was released earlier in the week (prior to June 05, 2025). The most likely reason is thatan LCM inventory has not been performed. LCM requires an inventory operation to check for available updates by querying Nutanix’s external repositories or a dark site server (if configured), and without this step, the latest version of Objects Manager will not appear in the LCM page.
TheNutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)course states, “Before upgrading components like Objects Manager via LCM, an inventory must be performed in Prism Central to retrieve the latest available versions from Nutanix repositories.” The inventory process updates the LCM catalog with the latest software versions, including Objects Manager, ensuring that the administrator can see and select the new release for upgrade. If the inventory has not been run recently, LCM will only show versions that were available during the last inventory, which may not include the latest release from earlier in the week.
TheNutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)study guide further elaborates that “a common reason for missing the latest component versions in LCM is the failure to perform an inventory; administrators must run an LCM inventory to ensure the latest versions, such as new releases of Objects Manager, are available for upgrade.” Since the latest version was released recently, an inventory is necessary to refresh the LCM catalog.
The other options are incorrect:
The administrator is logged in as local admin rather than a domain admin: The issue is not related to the type of admin account (local vs. domain). Both local and domain admins can perform LCM inventories and upgrades if they have the necessary permissions, and there is no indication of a permission error.
The administrator needs to perform the upgrade through Prism Element: LCM upgrades for Nutanix Objects components, including Objects Manager, are performed through Prism Central, not Prism Element, as Prism Central provides centralized management for such operations.
Prism Central needs to be scaled out: Scaling out Prism Central (e.g., adding more VMs) is not required to see available upgrades in LCM. The issue is related to the inventory process, not Prism Central’s scale.
The NUSA course documentation emphasizes that “running an LCM inventory is a critical step to ensure the latest versions of components like Objects Manager are visible in Prism Central for upgrades, especially for recent releases.”
An administrator needs to configure an SMB share for the user profiles in a company. Which network share type is most suitable for this task?
A standard share
A connected share
A distributed share
A WORM share
To configure an SMB share for user profiles in a company using Nutanix Files, the most suitable network share type is a **distributed share**. User profiles typically require a share that can scale with the number of users, provide high availability, and ensure consistent performance across multiple clients. A distributed share in Nutanix Files is designed to meet these needs by distributing data and workload across all File Server Virtual Machines (FSVMs) in the file server, ensuring scalability and load balancing.
The **Nutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)** course states, “A distributed share in Nutanix Files is ideal for workloads like user profiles, as it leverages all FSVMs to provide scalability, high availability, and consistent performance for large numbers of concurrent users.” Distributed shares are optimized for environments where multiple users access the share simultaneously, such as in user profile scenarios where each user has a profile folder accessed via SMB. This share type ensures that the workload is balanced across FSVMs, preventing any single FSVM from becoming a bottleneck.
The **Nutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)** study guide further elaborates that “distributed shares are recommended for user profile storage in Nutanix Files, as they provide seamless scalability and fault tolerance by distributing data across all FSVMs in the file server.” This is particularly important for user profiles, which are often accessed during login/logout events, requiring low latency and high concurrency support.
The other options are incorrect:
- **A standard share**: A standard share is hosted on a single FSVM, which can become a performance bottleneck and lacks the scalability needed for user profiles with many concurrent users.
- **A connected share**: There is no such share type as a “connected share” in Nutanix Files; this term is not applicable.
- **A WORM share**: A WORM (Write Once, Read Many) share is designed for immutable data retention (e.g., for compliance), not for user profiles, which require frequent read/write operations.
The NUSA course documentation emphasizes that “distributed shares are the best choice for user profile storage in Nutanix Files, ensuring scalability and performance for enterprise environments with many users.”
After configuring Smart DR, an administrator observes that a policy in the Policies tab is not visible within Prism Central (PC).
What is the likely cause of this issue?
The share permissions include more than one local user.
The initial replication has not completed.
The administrator is logged into PC with a local account rather than an AD account.
Port 7515 is not opened between the source and recovery networks.
Smart DR requires port 7515 (TCP) for communication between source/target clusters and Prism Central. If blocked:
Policies fail to synchronize with PC.
Policies become "invisible" in the UI.
Other options are unrelated:
A: Share permissions don’t affect policy visibility.
B: Initial replication progress appears in UI even if incomplete.
C: AD/local login affects permissions, not policy discovery.
Question:
An administrator has received a complaint from a user that a Windows VM lost access to an iSCSI Volume Group (VG) during a maintenance window of an ESXi-based Nutanix cluster. The VM’s iSCSI configuration shows it is connecting to a specific IP (172.20.100.104).
What recommended change should the administrator make to resolve this disruption?
Change the Discovery IP to match the configured VIP.
Remove Discovery IP and configure with DSIP.
Add all missing CVM IPs in Discovery tab.
Select the Enable multi-path checkbox.
When configuring iSCSI connections to Nutanix Volume Groups (VGs), Nutanix recommends using theData Services IP (DSIP)as the discovery IP in the iSCSI Initiator configuration. Here’s why:
TheDSIP (172.20.100.50)in this environment is designed to be highly available andfloats across CVMswithin the Nutanix cluster.
The DSIP automatically handles failover between CVMs during maintenance, software upgrades, or node failures.
Configuring the iSCSI initiator withindividual CVM IPs (like 172.20.100.104)is not recommended because:
If the CVM goes down (maintenance, upgrade, etc.), the initiator willlose connectionto the volume group, causing the exact issue seen here.
The NUSA and NCP-US course materials specifically emphasize:
“The Data Services IP should be used as the discovery target for iSCSI Volume Groups to ensure automatic failover and eliminate connection disruptions during maintenance windows.”
VIPis used formanagement traffic(Prism Central/Prism Element) and is not used for iSCSI.
Enable multi-pathis important for performance but does not resolve this misconfigured discovery IP issue.
Adding all CVMsindividually also doesn’t provide automated failover and isn’t a best practice.
Thus, the fix is toremove the CVM IP (172.20.100.104) and configure the Windows iSCSI initiator with the DSIP (172.20.100.50)as the discovery target.
At what level of granularity can Smart DR replicate?
Volume
Bucket
Share
File
Smart DR (Disaster Recovery) is a feature within Nutanix Unified Storage (NUS), specifically designed to facilitate data replication and disaster recovery for Nutanix Files, which is the file storage service component of NUS. Nutanix Unified Storage integrates file, object, and block storage services, but Smart DR is primarily associated with the file storage functionality provided by Nutanix Files. To determine the level of granularity at which Smart DR operates, we need to examine how it handles replication within this context.
Understanding the Options
Volume: In Nutanix terminology, a volume typically refers to a logical storage unit used in block storage services (e.g., Nutanix Volumes). It can contain multiple files or datasets and is managed at a higher abstraction level.
Bucket: A bucket is a container used in object storage (e.g., Nutanix Objects) to store objects, akin to a directory but specific to object-based storage systems.
Share: In Nutanix Files, a share refers to a file share (accessible via SMB or NFS protocols), which contains files and directories that are made available over a network for user access.
File: This represents an individual file, the smallest unit of data within a storage system.
Smart DR’s purpose is to ensure data availability and consistency for disaster recovery scenarios, which implies that the replication granularity should support recovering cohesive sets of data rather than fragmented pieces that could lead to inconsistencies.
Smart DR and Nutanix Files
According to the Nutanix Unified Storage documentation, Smart DR is specifically tailored for Nutanix Files to enable replication of file shares for disaster recovery. The key evidence comes from the NCP-US and NUSA course materials, which state:
"NUS also offers Smart DR to facilitateshare-level data replicationand file server-level disaster recovery."
(Reference: Nutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA) Study Guide, Section on Disaster Recovery Features for Nutanix Files)
This excerpt explicitly indicates that Smart DR performs replication at theshare level. In Nutanix Files, a share is a logical entity that groups files and directories together, accessible via protocols like SMB (Server Message Block) for Windows environments or NFS (Network File System) for UNIX/Linux environments. When configuring Smart DR, administrators select specific shares to replicate to a remote site, ensuring that the entire share—including all its files and directory structures—is replicated as a single unit. This approach maintains data consistency and simplifies recovery by allowing the entire share to be restored in a disaster scenario.
Why Not the Other Options?
Volume: While Nutanix Volumes (block storage) supports replication through features like Protection Domains or asynchronous replication, Smart DR is not documented as a feature for block storage replication. Protection Domains, for instance, operate at the VM or volume group level, not under the Smart DR umbrella. Thus, "Volume" is not the correct granularity for Smart DR.
Bucket: In Nutanix Objects (object storage), replication can occur at the bucket level, but this is managed through different mechanisms, such as object replication policies, not Smart DR. The documentation does not associate Smart DR with bucket-level replication, making "Bucket" incorrect.
File: Replicating individual files would be highly granular and impractical for disaster recovery, as it risks inconsistencies (e.g., missing related files or directory structures). While Nutanix Files supports file-level operations, Smart DR does not allow administrators to configure replication for individual files within a share. The replication unit is the share itself, ruling out "File."
Configuration in Practice
In the Nutanix Prism interface, when setting up Smart DR for Nutanix Files, administrators define replication policies by selecting specific file shares. The process involves:
Identifying the source file server and the shares to replicate.
Configuring a remote target (e.g., another Nutanix Files instance).
Scheduling replication to ensure data is copied to the DR site.
This is consistent with the NUSA course, which emphasizes that:
"Smart DR enables administrators to configure replication at the share level, ensuring that all data within the share is protected and recoverable."
(Reference: Nutanix Unified Storage (NCP-US) Study Guide, Module on Configuring Disaster Recovery)
Clarifying Scope
While Nutanix Unified Storage encompasses file, object, and block services, Smart DR is distinctly a feature of Nutanix Files. For object storage (Nutanix Objects), replication is handled at the bucket level via separate features, and for block storage (Nutanix Volumes), replication uses mechanisms like synchronous or asynchronous replication at the volume group level. However, the question specifically pertains to Smart DR, and the documentation consistently ties this feature to share-level replication.
Conclusion
The level of granularity for Smart DR replication is theshare, as it replicates entire file shares within Nutanix Files to ensure data consistency and effective disaster recovery. Among the provided options—Volume, Bucket, Share, and File—the correct answer is "Share," corresponding to option C.
Question:
What would an administrator need to do in order to move tagged objects to a remote Nutanix Objects instance after a period of time?
Configure a Cloud Bucket Endpoint with the Nutanix provider and a Lifecycle Policy to tier tagged objects within the bucket.
Configure WORM on the Bucket and a Lifecycle Policy to tier tagged objects within the bucket.
Configure WORM on the Bucket and a Lifecycle Policy to tier all objects within the bucket.
Configure a Cloud Bucket Endpoint with the Nutanix provider and a Lifecycle Policy to tier all objects within the bucket.
Lifecycle Policiesin Nutanix Objects allow administrators toautomate data tiering and archivalbased on specific criteria, including object tagging. According to the NUSA training:
“A Lifecycle Policy, combined with a Cloud Bucket Endpoint, enables automatic movement of objects (based on tags) to a remote Nutanix Objects instance or compatible S3 storage.”
Here’s the detailed process:
The administrator first configures aCloud Bucket Endpointto establish connectivity to theremote Nutanix Objects instance.
Then, they create aLifecycle Policythat targets objects with specific tags for tiering.
This policy ensures that onlytagged objectsmeeting the policy’s criteria are moved to the remote storage location.
Enabling WORM on the bucket is not required for tiering; WORM is forimmutability. Thekey mechanismfor tiering tagged objects is:
????Cloud Bucket Endpoint + Lifecycle Policy for tagged objects.
Question:
Which statement is true regarding Self-Service Restore?
Supports 15 minute snapshots.
Does not require NGT on the VM.
Supports Windows and Linux.
Supported with a Starter license.
Self-Service Restore (SSR)in Nutanix Files is a feature that allows end users or administrators torestore previous file versionsdirectly from share snapshots without requiring direct administrator intervention.
Key details from the NUSA training:
Does not require Nutanix Guest Tools (NGT):
“SSR operates entirely at the file server share level, leveraging share snapshots created by the Nutanix Files service. It does not depend on NGT or VM-level backups, which simplifies deployment and reduces dependencies.”
15-minute snapshots:
“While Nutanix supports snapshot intervals down to 1 hour, the minimum interval is not typically 15 minutes for standard file share snapshots.”
Windows and Linux:
“SSR is primarily supported for Windows SMB shares. NFS/Linux-based shares do not integrate with SSR in the same manner.”
Starter license support:
“SSR is part of advanced Nutanix Files functionality not included in the Starter license tier.”
Thus, the definitive statement:Does not require NGT on the VM.
What is the maximum number of snapshots that can be configured for a Nutanix Files snapshot schedule?
25
50
75
100
The maximum number of snapshots that can be configured for a Nutanix Files snapshot schedule is100. Nutanix Files supports snapshot schedules to automate the creation of point-in-time snapshots for file shares, which are useful for data protection, recovery, and backup purposes. The snapshot schedule defines how frequently snapshots are taken and how many are retained.
According to theNutanix Unified Storage Administration (NUSA)course, Nutanix Files allows administrators to configure snapshot schedules with a maximum retention of100 snapshotsper share. The course states, “Nutanix Files snapshot schedules can be configured to retain up to 100 snapshots, providing flexible data protection for file shares.” This limit ensures that administrators can maintain a sufficient number of recovery points while managing storage efficiency.
TheNutanix Certified Professional - Unified Storage (NCP-US)study guide reinforces this by noting that “the snapshot schedule for Nutanix Files supports a maximum of 100 snapshots per share, allowing for granular recovery options.” Administrators can configure the frequency (e.g., hourly, daily) and retention period, but the total number of snapshots retained cannot exceed 100 per share.
The other options (25, 50, 75) underestimate the maximum snapshot limit for Nutanix Files, as the system supports up to 100 snapshots to accommodate various data protection needs.
Question:
When naming an Object Store instance, which two naming rules must be followed? (Choose two.)
Must be a minimum of three and a maximum of 32 characters long.
Must begin with a number and end with a letter or number.
Must begin with a letter, and end with a letter or number.
Must be unique across all existing object store names in Objects.
During Nutanix Objects deployment,Object Store instance namingis governed by specific conventions to ensure system consistency and compatibility with DNS and object storage standards.
The NUSA course describes thesestrict naming rules:
Length Rule:
“Object store names must be between 3 and 32 characters in length. This ensures that the names are concise yet descriptive enough for operational clarity.”
Start/End Rule:
“Object store names must begin with a letter and end with a letter or a number. Names cannot start with a number or symbol to maintain naming consistency across DNS and storage services.”
Uniqueness Across All Clusters:
“While object store names must be unique within the same Nutanix cluster, global uniqueness across multiple clusters is not enforced or required.”
Starting with a number:
“Names starting with numbers are not supported, as per best practices to align with DNS naming standards.”
Thus, the enforced rules:
????Minimum 3, maximum 32 characters
????Begin with a letter and end with a letter/number