Pass the Juniper JNCIS-DC JN0-481 Questions and answers with CertsForce

In Apstra 5.1, the Active view represents the operational state of the deployed fabric (as opposed to the intended state being edited in Staged). Within Active, the Query function is designed for day-2 operations where an operator needs to quickly locate endpoint-related information and validate forwarding/neighbor state derived from the fabric. The query choices exposed in the UI are focused on operational lookup primitives rather than design objects. Specifically, Apstra supports querying MAC and ARP (and also VMs when virtual infrastructure integration is present).

MAC queries help identify where a Layer 2 endpoint is being learned in the fabric—useful for troubleshooting EVPN-VXLAN fabrics where MAC learning and advertisement can determine reachability and mobility behavior. ARP queries help identify IP-to-MAC bindings and validate whether hosts are being resolved correctly, which is critical when troubleshooting first-hop behavior (for example, IRB gateway adjacency, endpoint onboarding, or unexpected IP conflicts).

By contrast, “Virtual Network” and “Routing Zone” (VRF) are primarily design constructs managed in Staged and validated/assured by analytics and intent checks; they are not the direct query selectors in the Active > Query tool. Therefore, the two correct Active-query aspects from the given options are ARP and MAC.

Verified Juniper sources (URLs):

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.1/apstra-user-guide/topics/task/query-active.html

Apstra role-based access control separates fabric operations from identity and authorization administration. The administrator role includes full permissions, including the ability to manage users and roles (for example, creating users, assigning permissions, and creating/cloning/editing custom roles where allowed). This enables administrators to govern who can access the system and what they are permitted to change across all blueprints and system settings.

The user role, in contrast, is designed for day-to-day fabric work: viewing and editing supported blueprint elements and operational objects within the scope permitted by the role, but not administering other users’ access or modifying the role structure itself. In other words, a user can work on the network intent and operations, but cannot elevate privileges, change other users’ roles, or otherwise manage user/role administration unless explicitly granted additional permissions through custom roles.

That makes option C the correct statement: the user role cannot make changes to other user types (that is, it lacks the permissions needed to administer identities/roles). Options A, B, and D do not reflect Apstra’s RBAC model: roles are not primarily constrained “per blueprint” in that way, and users are not intended to modify other roles—those are administrator-level capabilities.

Verified Juniper sources (URLs):

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra6.0/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/user-role-management.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra4.2/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/user-role-management.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.0/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/user-role-management.html

In Apstra 5.1, Intent-Based Analytics (IBA) is built on Apstra’s graph-based source of truth, where devices, interfaces, links, routing constructs, and services are represented as nodes with relationships. An IBA probe is effectively a processing pipeline (a directed acyclic graph of stages and processors) that ingests telemetry and then performs calculations, aggregations, and anomaly detection. To make any of that work, the probe must first determine which specific objects in the graph—for example, which leaf switches, which uplinks, which BGP sessions, or which interface counters—should be included in the analysis.

The probe element that selects those objects is the graph query. A graph query is evaluated against Apstra’s graph database to return a set of matching nodes/relationships; those query results then become the scope for ingestion and subsequent processing. In other words, the graph query defines “apply this probe to these devices/interfaces/sessions,” and it also provides the context used to bind telemetry identities (key-value pairs describing the metric source) to the correct logical objects in the blueprint. This is why Apstra documentation describes early probe processors producing outputs whose cardinality aligns with the number of results returned by the specified graph query(s). Without a graph query, the probe would not have a deterministic, intent-aligned target set for analytics, and the same probe definition could not be reliably reused across fabrics or blueprints.

In Apstra 5.1, “resources” are the identifier values consumed by the fabric design and rendered into device configuration—examples include ASNs, IP addresses, VNIs, VLAN-related identifiers (where applicable), and similar allocation-driven values. These values are provided through resource pools, which are the authoritative containers Apstra draws from when assigning resources to blueprint roles (for example, leaf ASNs, spine ASNs, loopbacks, point-to-point subnets, and VNI ranges). A key architectural feature is that resource pools are not confined to one blueprint. Apstra supports pools with different scopes to match operational needs: some pools are managed centrally and reused across multiple blueprints, while other pools are created and used within the context of a specific blueprint when you want strict separation and lifecycle alignment with that blueprint.

This is why the correct statement is that a pool’s scope can be global or blueprint-specific. Global pools are appropriate when you want consistent allocation policy across fabrics (for example, enterprise-wide ASN ranges). Blueprint-specific pools are appropriate when you want per-fabric independence or when allocations are generated dynamically within the blueprint. This scope behavior is independent of Junos v24.4; Junos receives the final rendered values, but the pool scoping and allocation control are Apstra design-time constructs that ensure deterministic, conflict-free assignments at scale.

Verified Juniper sources (URLs):

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.1/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/resources.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.1/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/freeform-resource-management.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.1/apstra-user-guide/topics/ref/resource-pools-api.html

In Apstra, Deploy mode is the state in which a device is intended to fully participate in the fabric. For a three-stage eBGP IP Clos (typical EVPN-VXLAN underlay), “fully functioning” means the switch receives the complete, intent-derived configuration required for production operation—underlay interface addressing, BGP peering, routing policy constructs, and any overlay-related prerequisites appropriate for its role (leaf, spine, border leaf). In Apstra’s device configuration lifecycle, Deploy is the mode that causes Apstra to render and apply the full set of intended services for that node so it becomes an active member of the IP fabric and contributes to ECMP pathing and control-plane adjacency.

By contrast, Ready is commonly used when you want the device discovered and prepared (for example, basic identity and interface readiness), but not actively routing in the fabric. Drain is a maintenance state used to gracefully withdraw an already-deployed device from forwarding to minimize impact (for example, for upgrades or repairs). Not Set indicates the deploy mode has not been chosen and therefore does not represent an operationally complete participation state.

Therefore, when your objective is an operational IP fabric where the assigned devices are actively routing and forwarding according to blueprint intent on Junos v24.4, the correct choice is Deploy.

Juniper Apstra describes data center fabric management as a full lifecycle that spans three core phases: Design (Day 0), Deployment (Day 1), and Operations (Day 2). These phases map directly to how Apstra applies intent-based networking to a data center fabric.

In the Design phase, you model the intended architecture—templates (3-stage or 5-stage), rack types, logical devices, interface maps, resource pools, and high-level constructs such as routing zones and virtual networks. The objective is to capture intent in a vendor-agnostic way while ensuring consistency and validation before anything is pushed.

In the Deployment phase, Apstra turns the modeled intent into device-level implementation. This includes onboarding systems, assigning device profiles, allocating resources, rendering configurations, and pushing the resulting configuration to switches so the IP fabric becomes operational. This is where Junos v24.4 leaf/spine nodes receive underlay and overlay configuration generated from the blueprint.

In the Operational phase, Apstra continuously validates the running network against intent using telemetry and analytics (IBA), detects deviations and anomalies, supports maintenance workflows (such as drain), and provides troubleshooting tools (queries, time-series utilization, and configuration compliance).

“Configuration” and “installation” are activities that occur within the lifecycle, but the lifecycle phases themselves are Design, Deployment, and Operations.

The deploy phase is the final step in the Juniper Apstra data center fabric design and deployment process. In this phase, you apply the Apstra-rendered configuration to the devices and verify the intent of the blueprint. Based on the web search results, we can infer the following actions are required during the deploy phase12:

Assign device profiles to the blueprint. This action associates a specific vendor model to each logical device in the blueprint. Device profiles contain extensive hardware model details, such as form factor, ASIC, CPU, RAM, ECMP limit, and supported features. Device profiles also define how configuration is generated, how telemetry commands are rendered, and how configuration is deployed on a device. Device profiles enable the Apstra system to render and deploy the configuration according to the Apstra Reference Design34.

Assign resources to the blueprint. This action allocates the physical devices, IP addresses, VLANs, and ASNs to the logical devices, networks, and routing zones in the blueprint. Resources can be assigned manually or automatically by the Apstra system. Assigning resources ensures that the blueprint has all the necessary elements to generate the configuration and deploy the fabric5 .

Assign user roles to the blueprint. This action is not required during the deploy phase. User roles are defined at the system level, not at the blueprint level. User roles determine the permissions and access levels of different users in the Apstra system. User roles can be system-defined or custom-defined .

Assign interface maps to the blueprint. This action is not required during the deploy phase. Interface maps are defined at the design phase, not at the deploy phase. Interface maps are objects that map the logical interfaces of a logical device to the physical interfaces of a device profile. Interface maps enable the Apstra system to generate the correct interface configuration for each device in the fabric . References:

Deploy

Deploy Device

Device Profiles

Juniper Device Profiles

Resources

The exhibit shows the border leaf receiving multiple routes via BGP from the external router, including 172.23.x/24 prefixes, and those routes appearing in the Finance VRF routing table. To stop these routes from being installed in the Finance table, you must change what the border leaf imports from that eBGP session. In Apstra, this control is implemented through a Routing Policy attached to the protocol session described by the connectivity template. By setting the Import Policy to accept default route only, Apstra renders Junos policy so that only 0.0.0.0/0 is imported into the VRF, while the 172.23.x/24 prefixes are rejected and therefore never installed in Finance.inet.0.

Option C is a common trap: the “Expect Default IPv4 Route” setting is an assurance expectation—it generates an expectation/anomaly if the default route is missing, but it does not change device configuration or filtering behavior. Export-policy changes (option D) would only affect what the border leaf advertises outbound to the external router, not what it learns inbound. Aggregation (option A) does not prevent installation of the specific learned /24s; it changes advertisement behavior rather than import filtering. The correct fix is to tighten the import policy on that external eBGP session.

Verified Juniper sources (URLs):

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra5.1/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/routing-policies.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra6.0/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/routing-policies.html

https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/apstra4.2/apstra-user-guide/topics/concept/connectivity-templates.html

A security policy is the feature that would be used to accomplish the task of controlling access to other virtual networks in the same routing zone using the Juniper Apstra UI. A security policy allows you to define rules that specify which traffic is allowed or denied between different virtual networks, IP endpoints, or routing zones. A security policy can be applied to one or more virtual networks in the same routing zone, and it can use various criteria to match the traffic, such as source and destination IP addresses, protocols, ports, or tags. A security policy can also support DHCP relay, which enables the forwarding of DHCP requests from one virtual network to another. The other options are incorrect because:

A. interface policy is wrong because an interface policy is a feature that allows you to configure the interface parameters for the devices in a blueprint, such as interface names, speeds, types, or descriptions. An interface policy does not affect the access control between different virtual networks in the same routing zone.

B. anti-affinity policy is wrong because an anti-affinity policy is a feature that allows you to prevent certain devices or logical devices from being placed in the same rack or leaf pair in a blueprint. An anti-affinity policy is used to enhance the availability and redundancy of the network, not to control the access between different virtual networks in the same routing zone.

C. routing policy is wrong because a routing policy is a feature that allows you to configure the routing parameters for the devices in a blueprint, such as routing protocols, autonomous system numbers, route filters, or route maps. A routing policy does not affect the access control between different virtual networks in the same routing zone, unless the routing policy is used to filter or modify the routes exchanged between different routing zones. References:

Security Policy

Interface Policy

Anti-Affinity Policy

Routing Policy

According to the Juniper documentation1, an interface map is a configuration template that maps interfaces between logical devices and physical hardware devices (represented with device profiles) while adhering to vendor specifications. An interface map can be either predefined or custom. A predefined interface map is one that ships with Apstra software and supports most qualified Juniper devices. A custom interface map is one that is created by the user to meet specific requirements. An interface map can be stored in either the global catalog or the blueprint catalog. The global catalog contains all the interface maps that are available for use in any blueprint. The blueprint catalog contains the interface maps that are imported from the global catalog and used in a specific blueprint.

When a member of your organization makes changes to a predefined interface map, the following statements are correct:

Changes to interface maps in the global catalog do not affect interface maps that have already been imported into blueprint catalogs. This means that the existing blueprints that use the original version of the interface map will not be impacted by the changes. However, if you want to use the updated version of the interface map in a new or existing blueprint, you need to import it again from the global catalog.

Any changes made to predefined interface maps are discarded when Apstra is upgraded. This means that the changes will not be preserved across different versions of Apstra software. If you want to retain a customized interface map through Apstra upgrades, you need to clone the predefined interface map, give it a unique name, and customize it instead of changing the predefined one directly.

Therefore, the correct answer is A and B. Changes to interface maps in the global catalog do not affect interface maps that have already been imported into blueprint catalogs and any changes made to predefined interface maps are discarded when Apstra is upgraded. References: Edit Interface Map | Apstra 4.2 | Juniper Networks