Pass the Isaca IT Risk Fundamentals Certificate IT-Risk-Fundamentals Questions and answers with CertsForce

Control conditions that exist in IT systems and may be exploited by an attacker are known as vulnerabilities. Here's the breakdown:

Cybersecurity Risk Scenarios: These are hypothetical situations that outline potential security threats and their impact on an organization. They are not specific control conditions but rather a part of risk assessment and planning.

Vulnerabilities: These are weaknesses or flaws in the IT systems that can be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access or cause damage. Vulnerabilities can be found in software, hardware, or procedural controls, and addressing these is critical for maintaining system security.

Threats: These are potential events or actions that can exploit vulnerabilities to cause harm. While threats are important to identify, they are not the control conditions themselves but rather the actors or events that take advantage of these conditions.

Thus, the correct answer is vulnerabilities, as these are the exploitable weaknesses within IT systems.

The most important factor when developing risk scenarios is that they represent real and relevant potential risk events. The scenarios should be based on credible threats and vulnerabilities that could actually impact the organization. This ensures that the risk assessment is focused on the most important risks.

While considering risks that affect financial and strategic objectives (A) is important, relevance is paramount. Learning from competitors' experiences (B) can be helpful, but the scenarios must be relevant to your own organization.

The primary reason for a cost-benefit analysis in a risk response business case is to determine whether the reduction in risk achieved by the response justifies the cost of implementing it. It's about weighing the potential benefits (reduced risk) against the costs of the response.

While determining future resource requirements (B) and calculating ROI (C) can be part of the analysis, the primary focus is on justifying the cost based on risk reduction.

Outsourcing disaster recovery activities is an example of risk transfer. The organization is transferring the responsibility for managing the risk of a disaster to a third-party provider. The organization still faces the risk, but the responsibility for mitigating it now lies with the provider.

Risk mitigation (A) would involve implementing measures to reduce the likelihood or impact of a disaster. Risk avoidance (B) would mean ceasing the activity that creates the risk.

An alert triggered by exceeding network bandwidth usage is a key risk indicator (KRI). It's an indicator that something unusual is happening on the network that could be a sign of an increased risk, such as a denial-of-service attack or unauthorized activity.

It's not a threat (A) itself, but a potential sign of a threat. It's not a risk event (B) yet, but it could indicate an increased likelihood of a risk event. It's not a lag indicator (C) because it's alerting in real-time, not after the fact.