Pass the Google Professional Chrome Enterprise Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Questions and answers with CertsForce

When Chrome's Safe Browsing feature identifies a website as potentially risky and displays a warning page that the user might bypass to visit the site, this interaction is typically logged in the Audit and Investigation Report as a "Site Warning Unsafe Site Visit" event. This allows administrators to track instances where users might be exposed to potentially malicious content despite browser warnings. SSL errors relate to certificate issues, untrusted site visit is a more general term, and site isolation violation refers to a different security mechanism.

===========

A "3rd Party Risk Score" provides an objective assessment of the extension's security and privacy risks, often based on automated analysis of its code, requested permissions, developer reputation, and other factors. This is a more data-driven approach to evaluating safety compared to simply counting permissions (which doesn't account for the sensitivity of each permission), the Manifest version (which indicates features but not necessarily safety), or Chrome Web Store ratings (whichare subjective and can be manipulated).

===========

Policy conflicts can arise if the same policy is configured at multiple levels with different values. User group policies have a higher precedence than OU policies. Therefore, if a user within the Finance OU is also a member of a group with a conflicting policy setting, the group policy will override the OU policy. Policies at the same hierarchical level do not typically conflict in this way.If the Finance OU has "Locally applied," it would mean it's not inheriting, but it wouldn't explain a *discrepancy* within the OU itself unless multiple local settings were applied. A sub-OU inheriting from Finance wouldn't cause a discrepancy at the Finance OU level.

===========

The most likely reason for this discrepancy is that the version reported in the Chrome Enterprise Core compliance report might not be updated in real-time until Chrome is actively running and checks in. When an engineer logs in and launches Chrome, it likely completes the update process and reports the correct version. The auto-update feature generally works in the background, and a completely different unmanaged version (option C) or a persistent network block (option D) would likely prevent updates even when Chrome is launched. A malfunctioning auto-update (option A) is less likely to resolve itself upon manual launch.

===========

A "warning conflict" in `chrome://policy` indicates that multiple policy sources are trying to control the same setting. Since the browsers were previously managed by Group Policy, there's likely a conflict between the cloud policy and the local Group Policy. The best way to resolve this is to **check and configure the precedence order** of policy sources. Ensure that Cloud Policy is set to have the desired precedence over Group Policy if that's the intention. Restarting the computer might apply existing policies but won't resolve the conflict in precedence. Adjusting a "policy merge list setting" is not a standard term for resolving this type of conflict. Re-enrolling might give a fresh start but doesn't address the underlying conflict in policy sources.

===========