ZYXS has been chosen as the service integrator. Immediately after implementation an issue has arisen with a high priority incident. OUTSCO and ZYXD are passing the incident between them and are blaming each other for not owning the solution. Meanwhile the incident is approaching its target resolution time and may breach its service level
What should ZYXS do first?
The SIAM model in ZYX has been successfully implemented and operational for 6 months All service providers have signed up to multi-party service level agreements and a detailed collaboration agreement. All providers are either using or interfacing with the common ITSM tool.
NETSCO is providing all LAN and WAN services across the group Although NETSCO is consistently achieving all of its service levels and attends all necessary meetings. NETSCO is not contributing to the overall relationship with the other service providers.
The service integrator wishes to address this problem with NETSCO
What action should the service integrator take?
ZYX is initiating their NEWGEN SIAM transition project As part of the early planning, ZYX identifies key activities and milestones that must be included in the project plan.
What would be the best approach for ZYX to take in designing their SIAM governance framework?
The implementation of NEWGEN will onboard a number of existing service providers at differing levels of maturity. In addition, there will be new services (such as NEWBNK) and service providers (such as those to support planned expansion in the Asia Pacific region).
What would be the most advantageous approach to onboarding?
The outline SIAM model has been determined.
-SIAMRUS will be the service integrator.
-The development teams from ZYXS and ZYXUK will merge to provide global application development and support services
-ZYXS will also provide a centralized service desk, desktop support, and field engineer support.
-OUTSCO will provide hosting e-mail services, the wide area network, and local area networks under new contracts
-All services currently hosted by ZYXS or ZYXD will transfer to OUTSCO
The strategy is to transfer the current services to these named service providers as the legacy contracts expire
The merger with the Tokyo-based competitor has started and is expected to complete in 3 months' time. As part of the merger the services currently provided by the Tokyo-based internal functions will transfer to ZYXS and ZYXUK. The planning for this has only just started, there is insufficient time to create and test a detailed plan
What is the most appropriate implementation approach for the ZYX SIAM model?
What is the most appropriate implementation approach for the ZYX SIAM model?
ZYXS has been appointed as the service integrator ZYXH will provide the retained capabilities The CEO has asked the ZYXS IT Director to prepare a governance approach for monitoring and measuring service performance that will support the achievement of the strategic objective to ensure delivery against contracts.
What is the best approach?