An organization has several remote locations with minimum bandwidth and would like to use a content distribution method that does NOT involve configuring an internal LiveUpdate server. What content distribution method should be utilized?
For an organization withremote locations and minimal bandwidththat wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using aGroup Update Provider (GUP)is the best choice.
Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.
No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.
Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:
Option A (External LiveUpdate)would involve each client connecting to Symantec’s servers, which could strain bandwidth.
Option B (Management Server)directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.
Option C (Intelligent Updater)is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.
Thus, theGroup Update Provideris the optimal solution forremote locations with limited bandwidththat do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit