The Sprint Retrospective is an event for the entire Scrum Team to inspect how the last Sprint went with regard to individuals, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done, and then plan improvements for the next Sprint.
The Product Owner is part of the Scrum Team. Therefore, during the Sprint Retrospective, the Product Owner participates as a Scrum Team member.
Why C is correct:
The Scrum Guide explicitly says the Sprint Retrospective is an opportunity for the Scrum Team to inspect itself and create a plan for improvements. Since the Product Owner is one of the three accountabilities within the Scrum Team, they are expected to participate.
Why A is incorrect:
Capturing requirements for the Product Backlog is not the purpose of the Sprint Retrospective. The Retrospective focuses on team effectiveness, collaboration, processes, tools, and improvements. Product Backlog refinement and stakeholder/value discussions happen elsewhere as needed.
Why B is incorrect:
The Product Owner is part of the Scrum Team, so they should attend the Sprint Retrospective. The event is for the whole Scrum Team, not just Developers or only the Scrum Master.
Why D is incorrect:
The Sprint Retrospective is an internal Scrum Team event focused on improvement. The Scrum Guide does not assign the Product Owner responsibility for summarizing and reporting Retrospective discussions to stakeholders. In practice, Retrospectives are often kept within the team to support openness and honest inspection.
[References:, 2020 Scrum Guide – Scrum Team: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#scrum-team, 2020 Scrum Guide – Sprint Retrospective: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html#sprint-retrospective, , , ]
Submit