This question pertains to Domain IV: Assessment, Planning, and Outcomes, which focuses on incorporating individuals’ strengths, preferences, and cultural factors into rehabilitation planning. The CPRP Exam Blueprint emphasizes “integrating individuals’ spiritual or cultural practices into rehabilitation plans to support recovery goals, particularly when these practices are meaningful to symptom management.” The individual’s use of a spiritual advisor to manage positive symptoms is a strength that should be leveraged in planning.

Option A: Using the information to inform the rehabilitation planning and goal-setting process is the best approach, as it respects the individual’s spiritual practices and incorporates them as a strength in her recovery plan. This could involve goals that integrate spiritual support alongside other interventions, aligning with person-centered planning.

Option B: Developing a crisis management plan is premature, as the scenario does not indicate a crisis but rather a proactive strategy for symptom management.

Option C: Dismissing the spiritual advisor as irrelevant is disrespectful and ignores the individual’s cultural and personal strengths, contradicting recovery principles.

Option D: Reinforcing medication use without acknowledging the spiritual practice is overly directive and misses an opportunity to build on the individual’s existing coping strategies.

Extract from CPRP Exam Blueprint (Domain IV: Assessment, Planning, and Outcomes):

“Tasks include: 2. Incorporating individuals’ cultural, spiritual, and personal strengths into rehabilitation plans to support recovery goals.”