Scenario 1:

into incidents that could result in substantial material or non-material damage. When it comes to identifying and mitigating risks, the company has employed a standardized methodology. It conducts thorough risk identification processes across all operational levels, deploys mechanisms for early risk detection, and adopts a uniform framework to ensure a consistent and effective incident response. In alignment with its incident reporting plan, SecureTech reports on the initial stages of potential incidents, as well as after the successful mitigation or resolution of the incidents.

Moreover, SecureTech has recognized the dynamic nature of cybersecurity, understanding the rapid technological evolution. In response to the ever-evolving threats and to safeguard its operations, SecureTech took a proactive approach by implementing a comprehensive set of guidelines that encompass best practices, effectively safeguarding its systems, networks, and data against threats. The company invested heavily in cutting-edge threat detection and mitigation tools, which are continuously updated to tackle emerging vulnerabilities. Regular security audits and penetration tests are conducted by third-party experts to ensure robustness against potential breaches. The company also prioritizes the security of customers’ sensitive information by employing encryption protocols, conducting regular security assessments, and integrating multi-factor authentication across its platforms.

According to scenario 1, SecureTech strongly emphasizes adopting a proactive cybersecurity approach, primarily focusing on preventing cyber threats before they escalate into incidents that could result in substantial material or non-material damage. Is this in alignment with the NIS 2 Directive?