The correct answer is Detailed descriptions of all audit findings with corrective actions, because this information is not a required element of a quality review documentation template. Quality review documentation focuses on verifying the adequacy, consistency, and compliance of the audit process itself, not on managing corrective actions.

According to ISO/IEC 17021-1 and ISO 19011, quality review records typically include identification of the reviewer and preparer, confirmation that required audit steps were completed, dates of review activities, and confirmation that conclusions are supported by evidence. These elements ensure traceability, accountability, and procedural compliance.

Option A is required because identifying both the preparer and reviewer supports independence and accountability in the review process. Option C is also required because recording completion dates provides evidence that reviews were performed at the appropriate stage of the audit process.

Option B is incorrect because detailed audit findings and corrective actions belong in audit reports and corrective action tracking systems, not in the quality review template. Including corrective actions in quality review documentation would blur the distinction between audit execution and audit oversight.

Therefore, detailed descriptions of audit findings with corrective actions are not a required element of quality review documentation.