Month End Sale Limited Time 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: simple70

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Question # 94 Topic 10 Discussion

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Question # 94 Topic 10 Discussion

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Topic 10 Question 94 Discussion:
Question #: 94
Topic #: 10

Scenario 9

CloudFort, a small networking company, provides network security, cloud computing, and virtualization solutions. The company has recently been certified in an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard, which has resulted in a spike in its recognition, confirming the maturity of CloudFort’s operation.

CloudFort continually reviewed and enhanced its security controls and the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the ISMS by conducting internal audits. Due to its size and desire for greater objectivity, the top management decided to outsource the internal audit function to ensure the internal audit is independent of the audited activities and holds an advisory role in the continual improvement of the ISMS.

After the initial certification audit, the company created a new department specializing in data storage solutions. It offered routers and switches optimized for data centers and software-based networking devices, such as network virtualization and network security appliances. Because of the new department, CloudFort initiated a risk assessment process and an internal audit. Following the internal audit results, the company confirmed the effectiveness and efficiency of the new processes and controls.

After determining that the new department fully complies with ISO/IEC 27001 requirements, top management decided to include it in the certification scope. They submitted a request to the certification body for an extension of the certification scope to ensure that the department’s processes and security measures fully align with the overall ISMS.

One year after the initial certification audit, the certification body conducted another audit of CloudFort's ISMS. This audit aimed to determine CloudFort’s ISMS fulfillment of specified ISO/IEC 27001 requirements and ensure that the ISMS is being continually improved. The audit team confirmed that the certified ISMS fulfills the standard requirements. Nonetheless, the new department introduced changes that significantly affected how the overall management system was governed, requiring updates to existing processes and controls.

Moreover, although CloudFort requested an extension of the certification scope, they failed to provide timely updates on the impact of the new department on the ISMS to the certification body. Thus, CloudFort’s certification was suspended.

Question

CloudFort requested an extension of the certification scope to include the new department. How would you classify this situation? Refer to Scenario 9.


A.

Unacceptable, because the extension should have been included in the initial certification scope and cannot be added afterward unless a major recertification process is undertaken.


B.

Acceptable, many auditees can define a reduced scope for the first certification and then request for an extension during the following years.


C.

Unacceptable, as expanding the scope requires a complete audit of the organization again.


Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions

Contribute your Thoughts:


Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.