You are asked to review files affected by malware in your organization. In this scenario, which two actions are possible and would be accessible from the Netskope UI -> Incidents --> Malware? (Choose two)
A.
Download the original malware file generating the alert to be analyzed by the SOC team
B.
Identify the exposure of the file identified as malware.
C.
Remediate the compromised devices.
D.
Determine the Detection Engine used to identify the malware.
When reviewing files affected by malware in the Netskope UI under Incidents -> Malware, you have the following options:
Identify the exposure of the file identified as malware: This allows you to see where the malware has spread within the organization, which users or systems are affected, and any potential data exposure resulting from the malware.
Determine the Detection Engine used to identify the malware: Netskope provides details on which detection engine (such as AV, sandboxing, or other heuristic engines) identified the malware. This helps in understanding the threat vector and the reliability of the detection.
Downloading the original malware file (option A) is generally not recommended for security reasons and may not be supported directly from the Netskope UI. Remediation of compromised devices (option C) would typically be handled through endpoint security solutions rather than directly from the Netskope UI.
References:
Netskope documentation on malware detection and incident response.
Best practices for handling malware incidents and using the Netskope UI for threat analysis.
=================
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit