In a collaborative, less bureaucratic structure, release management needs to balance decentralization with oversight to ensure consistency and alignment. TheITIL® 4 Practitioner: Release Managementdocument advises:"In organizations adopting collaborative practices, release management responsibilities can be delegated to product and project teams to enable faster decision-making, but a release manager should be appointed to coordinate and coach the teams, ensuring consistency and adherence to standards"(Section 3.3.2).

Option A (Centralized team) contradicts the goal of reducing bureaucracy and enabling faster, collaborative practices.

Option B (Delegate all responsibilities) risks inconsistency and lack of oversight, which can lead to uncoordinated releases.

Option C (Delegate most responsibilities but appoint a release manager to coordinate and coach) balances decentralization with oversight, aligning with the goal of faster, collaborative practices while maintaining consistency.

Option D (Appoint a release manager in every team) is overly resource-intensive and may lead to fragmented approaches across teams.

The correct answer is C, as it best supports the new organizational structure while ensuring effective release management.