IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Asia (CIPP/A) CIPP-A Question # 16 Topic 2 Discussion

IAPP Certified Information Privacy Professional/Asia (CIPP/A) CIPP-A Question # 16 Topic 2 Discussion

CIPP-A Exam Topic 2 Question 16 Discussion:
Question #: 16
Topic #: 2

In 2013-14, the Indian Supreme Court ruled in Puttaswamy v Union of India that requiring a Unique Identification Number was unconstitutional if what?


A.

It was restricted to residents of India.


B.

It was necessary for proving citizenship.


C.

It was required in order to obtain government services.


D.

It was used to gather information to discriminate against minorities.


Get Premium CIPP-A Questions

Contribute your Thoughts:


Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.