If the SQA finds that the safety and quality requirements are not met, the SQA shall communicate with the business personnel for confirmation. The opinions of the business personnel shall prevail.
The exact extract states that if the SQA finds safety and quality requirements are not met, the SQA should communicate with business personnel and that “the opinions of the business personnel shall prevail.” This is incorrect because SQA is not a passive role that simply accepts business-side opinions when safety or quality requirements are violated. In Huawei-style partner quality management, SQA acts as a safety and quality guardian, process controller, and closed-loop improvement driver. If requirements are not met, the correct action is to identify the nonconformance, confirm facts with the business team, drive correction, and escalate when necessary. Business personnel may provide context, but their opinion cannot override defined safety and quality requirements. Safety and quality requirements exist to protect delivery reliability, customer acceptance, personnel safety, and compliance. Therefore, the statement is false because confirmation is required, but business opinion does not automatically prevail over quality standards. Reference: Huawei HCSA-Sales-Smart PV V2.0 Partner Quality Management training extract.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit