Local anti-corruption laws (A) provide insight into the legal framework and enforcement environment, while Transparency International (B) publishes the Corruption Perceptions Index and reports on bribery risks worldwide. These are reliable sources for assessing corruption levels and associated risks. UNSDGs set broad sustainability goals but not country-specific corruption risks. The ICC deals with arbitration, not anti-bribery. ISO standards provide frameworks for compliance but do not analyse country risk. Responsible sourcing requires due diligence on governance environments to mitigate bribery risks and comply with anti-corruption legislation such as the UK Bribery Act.
[Reference: CIPS L4M4 Study Guide (v2), LO: “Concepts” – ethical risk, corruption, and international frameworks., , , ]
Submit