For a company facing highly unpredictable demand for an end item, an Assemble-to-Order (ATO) production method is best suited for meeting customer demand within a reasonable lead time. Here's why:
Flexibility: ATO combines the advantages of both make-to-stock (MTS) and make-to-order (MTO). Core components are stocked based on demand forecasts, and final assembly is done upon receiving customer orders, providing flexibility to meet specific customer requirements quickly.
Lead Time Reduction: Since the components are already available, the final assembly process is faster, reducing lead times compared to ETO or MTO.
Customization: ATO allows for customization of end products based on customer specifications without the long lead times associated with starting production from scratch.
Inventory Management: It balances the need for inventory and the ability to respond to unpredictable demand, minimizing the risk of stockouts or excess inventory.
[References:, Vollmann, T. E., Berry, W. L., Whybark, D. C., & Jacobs, F. R. (2005). Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management. McGraw-Hill., Stevenson, W. J. (2020). Operations Management. McGraw-Hill., , ]
Submit