A company needs to retain tog data archives for several years to be compliant with regulations. The tog data is no longer used but It must be retained
What Is the MOST secure and cost-effective solution to meet these requirements?
A.
Archive the data to Amazon S3 and apply a restrictive bucket policy to deny the s3 DeleteOotect API
B.
Archive the data to Amazon S3 Glacier and apply a Vault Lock policy
C.
Archive the data to Amazon S3 and replicate it to a second bucket in a second IAM Region Choose the S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-1A) storage class and apply a restrictive bucket policy to deny the s3 DeleteObject API
D.
Migrate the log data to a 16 T8 Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volume Create a snapshot of the EBS volume
To securely and cost-effectively retain log data archives for several years, the company should do the following:
Archive the data to Amazon S3 Glacier and apply a Vault Lock policy. This allows the company to use a low-cost storage class that is designed for long-term archival of data that is rarely accessed. It also allows the company to enforce compliance controls on their S3 Glacier vault by locking a vault access policy that cannot be changed.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit