One of the key advantages of cloud computing is the ability totrade fixed expenses (like data centers and physical servers) for variable expenses. With AWS, companies pay only for the compute power, storage, and other resources they use, rather than investing heavily in on-premises infrastructure upfront. This reduces capital expenditure and helps lower overall costs.
Why other options are not suitable:
A. Go global in minutes: Refers to the ability to quickly deploy applications around the world, but does not directly reduce upfront costs.
B. Increase speed and agility: Refers to the ability to quickly scale and deploy resources, but is not directly related to cost reduction.
C. Benefit from massive economies of scale: Refers to AWS's ability to lower costs by leveraging its scale, but the primary advantage for reducing upfront costs is moving from fixed to variable expenses.
[References:, AWS Cloud Economics, , ]
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit