The least operational overhead comes from automated tools that can scan and evaluate LLM outputs for toxicity. AWS and SageMaker JumpStart support integrations with automatic evaluation tools and APIs (such as Amazon Comprehend or third-party toxicity classifiers).

B is correct: Automated evaluation provides quick, scalable, and repeatable analysis, requiring minimal human intervention.

A and C require manual effort, increasing operational overhead.

D (RLHF) is resource-intensive and not designed for rapid, automated model comparison.

"Automated evaluation can quickly assess generated text for specific attributes like toxicity, sentiment, or compliance using pre-trained classifiers, reducing human involvement and operational complexity."

(Reference: AWS SageMaker JumpStart Evaluation, AWS AI Practitioner Guide)