 Segregation of Duties and the Fraud Triangle:

TheFraud Triangleidentifies three conditions that contribute to fraud:pressure,opportunity, andrationalization.

Segregating duties (e.g., separating authorization, recordkeeping, and asset custody) is specifically designed to reduceopportunity, which is the chance for an employee to commit fraud without detection.

 Why Opportunity Is Key:

If one person has too much control over a process, they may exploit it for personal gain. Segregating duties creates checks and balances, making it harder for fraudulent activities to go unnoticed.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Pressure:Pressure refers to personal or financial stresses that drive someone to commit fraud, but segregation of duties does not address this directly.

C. Rationalization:Rationalization involves justifying fraudulent behavior, which segregation does not prevent.

D. Detection:While segregation can aid in fraud detection, its primary role is to reduce opportunities for fraud.

 References and Documents:

GAO Standards for Internal Control (Green Book):Emphasizes segregation of duties as a control to mitigate opportunities for fraud.

COSO Internal Control Framework:Identifies segregation of duties as a key tool to reduce fraud risk.