By including an assessment of channel, credit, and transaction risks, the client’s overall risk profile is accurately determined. This aligns with risk-based approaches emphasized by FATF and CAMS-Audit standards.
These risk factors provide a granular view of the client’s risk level, ensuring proper classification into Standard or Enhanced Due Diligence categories.
Regulatory Alignment
FATF Recommendations mandate that client risk assessments consider the products, services, and delivery channels used, as well as geographic and transactional risks.
ConclusionImplementing composite AML and sanctions risk scores ensures the institution is compliant with regulatory standards and adequately mitigates risks associated with different client profiles.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). You can switch to a simple comment. It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Submit