Pass the CrowdStrike CCIS IDP Questions and answers with CertsForce

A modern Zero Trust security architecture fundamentally differs from the traditional wall-and-moat model byeliminating implicit trust based on network location. As defined inNIST SP 800-207and reinforced in the CCIS curriculum, Zero Trust requirescontinuous authentication and authorization of all entities, regardless of whether they originate from inside or outside the network.

Traditional perimeter-based security assumes that users and devices inside the network are trusted, focusing defenses at the boundary. This approach fails in modern environments where cloud access, remote work, and compromised credentials allow attackers to operate internally without triggering perimeter controls.

Zero Trust replaces this assumption with continuous validation using identity, behavior, device posture, and risk signals. Falcon Identity Protection operationalizes this concept by continuously inspecting authentication traffic and reassessing trust throughout a session, not just at login time.

Because Zero Trust applies universally and continuously,Option Dis the correct and verified answer.

Identity Protection API documentation is part of CrowdStrike’s centralized API documentation structure. According to the CCIS curriculum,Identity Protection API information is located under the “CrowdStrike APIs” documentation category.

This category includes:

API authentication and scopes

Identity Protection GraphQL schemas

Query examples for detections, incidents, users, and risk

Usage guidance and limitations

CrowdStrike consolidates all API-related documentation in one location to ensure consistent access and maintenance across Falcon modules. Identity Protection APIs are not documented under Falcon Management, Store, or general reference sections.

Because all product APIs—including Identity Protection—are documented underCrowdStrike APIs,Option Dis the correct and verified answer.

Falcon Identity Protection follows acorrelation and enrichment modelwhere events, detections, and incidents are dynamically linked over time. According to the CCIS curriculum,events that occur after an incident is marked In Progress do not automatically create a new incident. Instead, related events and detections are typicallyadded to the existing incident, provided they fall within the incident’s correlation and suppression window.

This behavior allows Falcon to present asingle evolving incident, showing the full progression of an identity attack rather than fragmenting activity into multiple incidents. Therefore, statementA is not true.

The other statements are correct:

Detections can be retroactively associated with incidents that occurred earlier if correlation logic determines relevance.

Events can be linked to detections even if the detection is created after the event occurred.

Not all events are security-relevant; many remain informational and never become detections.

This adaptive correlation model is a core concept in CCIS training and supports efficient investigation and incident lifecycle management. Hence,Option Ais the correct answer.

In Falcon Identity Protection,default insightsare prebuilt analytical views provided by CrowdStrike to immediately highlight common and high-impact identity risks across the environment. These default insights are automatically available in theRisk AnalysisandInsightsareas and are designed to surface well-known identity exposure patterns without requiring customization.

Examples ofdefault insightsincludeUsing Unmanaged Endpoints,GPO Exposed Password, andCompromised Password. These insights are natively provided because they represent frequent and high-risk identity attack vectors such as credential exposure, unmanaged authentication sources, and password compromise, all of which directly contribute to elevated identity risk scores.

Poorly Protected Accounts with SPN (Service Principal Name), however, isnot provided as a default insight. While Falcon Identity Protection does collect and analyze SPN-related risk signals—such as Kerberoasting exposure and weak service account protections—this specific grouping must be created by administrators usingcustom insight filters. Custom insights allow teams to define precise conditions, combine attributes (privilege level, SPN presence, password age, MFA status), and tailor risk visibility to their organization’s threat model.

This distinction is emphasized in the CCIS curriculum, which explains thatcustom insights extend beyond default coverage, enabling deeper, organization-specific identity risk analysis. Therefore,Option Dis the correct answer.

Falcon Identity Protection is designed toextend—not replace—existing MFA solutions. According to the CCIS curriculum, Identity Protection enhances MFA by adding arisk-driven, policy-based enforcement layerthat dynamically triggers MFA challenges when risky or abnormal identity behavior is detected.

Rather than applying MFA uniformly, Falcon evaluates authentication context such as behavioral deviation, privilege usage, and anomaly detection. When risk thresholds are exceeded, Policy Rules can enforce MFA through integrated connectors, providing adaptive, Zero Trust–aligned authentication.

The incorrect options misunderstand Falcon’s role. Identity Protection does detect risky behavior, does not replace MFA providers, and fully supports both cloud and on-premises MFA connectors.

Because Falcon adds intelligence-driven enforcement on top of MFA,Option Ais the correct and verified answer.

The Domain Security Overview in Falcon Identity Protection usesGoalsto frame identity risks into focused security assessment perspectives. These goals allow organizations to evaluate identity posture based on specific security priorities such as directory hygiene, privilege exposure, or overall attack surface reduction.

According to the CCIS curriculum, theavailable GoalsincludePrivileged Users Management,AD Hygiene,Pen Testing, andReduce Attack Surface. These goals are predefined by CrowdStrike and determine how risks are grouped, weighted, and presented in reports.

Business Privileged Users Managementisnot an available Goalwithin the Domain Security Overview. While Falcon Identity Protection does support the concept ofbusiness privilegesand evaluates their impact on users and entities, this concept is handled through risk analysis and configuration—not as a selectable Domain Security Goal.

The CCIS documentation clearly distinguishes betweenGoals(which control reporting and assessment views) andbusiness privilege modeling(which influences risk scoring). Therefore,Option Bis the correct and verified answer.

Falcon Identity Protection is architected as alog-free identity security platform, a core tenet emphasized throughout the CCIS curriculum. Unlike traditional SIEM- or log-based solutions, Falcon Identity Protection doesnot require string-based queriesto continuously assess identity events or associate them with threats.

Instead, the platform relies onmachine-learning-powered detection rules,real-time authentication traffic inspection, andAPI-based connectorsto collect and analyze identity telemetry directly from domain controllers and identity providers. This approach eliminates the operational complexity of building, tuning, and maintaining query logic.

String-based queries are commonly associated with legacy log aggregation tools and SIEM platforms, where analysts must manually search logs to identify suspicious behavior. Falcon Identity Protection replaces this model withbehavioral baselining and automated correlation, enabling continuous identity risk assessment without human-driven query execution.

Because Falcon does not require string-based queries to operate,Option Dis the correct and verified answer.