Pass the CompTIA PenTest+ PT0-002 Questions and answers with CertsForce

When a penetration tester notices several target hosts appearing to be residential connections associated with a major television and ISP, it's likely that the IP ranges initially assigned to the target organization have changed ownership and are now allocated to the ISP for residential use. This can happen due to reallocation of IP addresses by regional internet registries. Misconfiguration of the scanner (option A), malfunctioning of scanning tools (option B), or firewall blocking (option D) would not typically result in the discovery of residential connections in place of expected organizational targets.

Requiring local network access for the default Admin User account is a targeted measure to prevent unauthorized access from unfamiliar IP addresses, particularly those originating from outside the organization's network. This approach ensures that only devices physically connected to or authenticated within the local network can attempt to use the Admin User account, significantly reducing the risk of external attacks. Increasing password complexity and restricting simultaneous log-ins are good practices but do not directly address the issue of access from unfamiliar IPs. System hardening is broader and not specifically focused on the Admin User account issue.

The communication escalation path is a component of the Rules of Engagement (ROE) that provides a penetration tester with guidance on whom to contact and how to proceed in the event of an emergency or disaster during an engagement. This includes contact information for key individuals and predefined procedures to follow to ensure that any issues are addressed promptly and appropriately.

The engagement scope defines the boundaries and objectives of the test, the SLA (Service Level Agreement) outlines performance and uptime requirements, and the SOW (Statement of Work) details the tasks and deliverables. However, the communication escalation path specifically addresses communication protocols during emergencies.

References:

Explanation of Rules of Engagement components: OWASP Testing Guide

Examples from penetration testing engagements highlighting the importance of communication plans: Anubis​​.

A retest is a follow-up assessment where the penetration tester checks if the vulnerabilities found in the initial test have been fixed or mitigated by the client. A retest can provide many benefits, such as verifying the effectiveness of the remediation actions, showing improvement to internal or external stakeholders, and reducing the risk of future exploitation. A retest is usually performed after a certain period of time, which can be agreed upon in the rules of engagement or the statement of work. A week after the scheduled maintenance window is a reasonable time frame to allow the client to apply the necessary patches or configuration changes to their network. Therefore, the client is most likely attempting to test the efficacy of the remediation effort by asking for a retest. References:

•The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 7: Reporting and Communication, page 375-376.

•Is a Re-Test Included with a Penetration Test?1

The nmap command with the -p- flag scans all ports from 1 to 65535 on the target host. The -A flag enables OS detection, version detection, script scanning, and traceroute. Therefore, the command will scan 65,535 ports on the host 10.0.1.10 and perform additional analysis on the open ports. References:

•The Official CompTIA PenTest+ Study Guide (Exam PT0-002), Chapter 2: Conducting Passive Reconnaissance, page 72-73.

•Nmap Cheat Sheet 2024: All the Commands & Flags - StationX1

•Nmap Commands - 17 Basic Commands for Linux Network - phoenixNAP2

To limit observation of the penetration tester’s activities and lower the probability of detection by intrusion protection and detection systems, the security analyst should use the Nmap -D 10.5.2.2 192.168.3.3 command 1. The -D option is used to conceal the identity of the attacker by using decoy IP addresses. This option can be used to confuse the IDS/IPS and lower the probability of detection 1.

References: 1: CompTIA. (2021). CompTIA PenTest+ Certification Exam Objectives. Retrieved from https://www.comptia.org/content/dam/comptia/documents/certifications/Exam%20Objectives/CompTIA-PenTest%2B%20Exam%20Objectives%20PT0- 002.pdf

When a web application firewall (WAF) is blocking most of the attacks, a direct-to-origin attack is likely to succeed. A direct-to-origin attack targets the backend servers directly, bypassing the WAF. This type of attack exploits any functionality that allows direct access to the origin servers (backend servers) without passing through the WAF. Techniques such as manipulating DNS, exploiting misconfigurations, or using direct IP access can be employed to bypass the WAF, making direct-to-origin attacks effective under these circumstances.

References:

OWASP WAF Bypass Techniques

Imperva - What is a WAF? Web Application Firewall