Pass the CSI Canadian Investment Funds IFC Questions and answers with CertsForce

A mutual fund trust structure allows the fund to avoid taxation by distributing its income to unitholders. The feedback from the document states:

"The most common structure for mutual funds in Canada is the open-end trust. The trust structure allows a fund itself to avoid taxation. Any interest, dividends and capital gains income, net of the fund’s fees, expenses and capital losses, if passed to its unitholders each calendar year, will allow the trust to avoid being taxed on its income."

Loretta is looking for a well diversified equity fund that invests both within and outside Canada. She also wants a fund that invests in quality companies, which implies that she prefers lower risk and higher stability. A global equity fund would meet her criteria, as it can invest in any country, including Canada, and diversify across different regions and markets. A global equity fund that focuses on large, established companies, also known as blue chip stocks, would also suit her preference for quality and stability, as these companies tend to have strong financial performance, competitive advantages, and consistent dividends. Therefore, the Polar Global Blue Chip Equity Fund would be the best choice for Loretta among the given options.

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Unit 6, Section 6.2

According to the Canadian Investment Funds Course, inflation is the general increase in the prices of goods and services over time. Inflation reduces the purchasing power of money, meaning that a dollar can buy less in the future than it can today. Inflation also affects the returns of fixed income investments, such as bonds, which pay a fixed amount of interest and principal. If inflation is higher than expected, the real rate of return (the nominal rate minus inflation) of a bond will be lower than anticipated.

In this case, Pippa purchased a 15-year bond with a 7% coupon rate at the time of issuance. The bond is due to mature later this year. The general interest rate climate remained stable for the first 13 years of the bond’s term. However, especially over the past 18 months, both inflation and general interest rates have increased more than expected. This means that Pippa will receive less purchasing power from her bond’s interest and principal payments than she expected when she bought the bond. She will not experience a capital loss, as she will receive the full face value of $5,000 at maturity. She will also not benefit from a higher real rate of return, as inflation erodes the value of her fixed payments. She will not receive any capital appreciation, as the bond’s price does not change once it is held to maturity.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. The return of investment capital will have lower purchasing power than prior to investing.

 1: Canadian Investment Funds Course - IFSE Institute 2 (Unit 4: Fixed Income Securities)

A company’s retained earnings statement is a financial statement that shows how the company’s net income is distributed between dividends paid to shareholders and retained earnings, which are the amount of profit that is reinvested in the company. Retained earnings are part of the company’s equity, and they reflect the accumulated earnings that the company has generated over its history, minus any dividends or distributions. Retained earnings can be used by the company for various purposes, such as expanding its operations, developing new products, paying off debt, or buying back shares1

References = Canadian Investment Funds Course, Unit 5: Types of Investments, Lesson 3: Equity Securities, Section 5.3.4: Financial Statements

Beta is a measure of the systematic risk of an investment, which is the risk that is related to the movements of the market as a whole. Beta compares the volatility of an investment to the volatility of the market. A beta of 1 means that the investment has the same level of risk as the market, and it tends to move in the same direction and magnitude as the market. A beta of 0 means that the investment has no correlation with the market, and it is unaffected by market fluctuations. A beta greater than 1 means that the investment is more risky than the market, and it tends to amplify the market movements. A beta less than 1 means that the investment is less risky than the market, and it tends to dampen the market movements. Therefore, if an investor was looking for an investment with a risk equal to that of the market, she would want a beta of 1. References:

Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) Study Guide, Chapter 4: Mutual Funds, Section 4.5: Risk and Return of Mutual Funds, page 4-231

Beta Definition - Investopedia2

A tax trap is a situation where an investor buys a mutual fund just before its ex-dividend date and ends up paying taxes on the distributions that they receive shortly after. This reduces their after-tax return and erodes their capital. To avoid the tax trap, it is advisable to buy the mutual fund after the ex-dividend date, when the fund’s net asset value (NAV) drops by the amount of the distribution. This way, the investor does not receive any taxable income and preserves their capital. Therefore, you should advise Charlie to purchase the Sentinel Canadian Equity Fund after December 20, when the fund goes ex-dividend.

Canadian Investment Funds Course, Unit 8, Section 8.2; 4; 5; 6

Whether the couple saves on income tax will be dependent on Minu’s marginal tax rate. Pension income splitting is a tax planning strategy that allows a spouse or common-law partner who receives eligible pension income to allocate up to 50% of that income to their spouse or common-law partner1. This may result in tax savings if the transferring spouse or common-law partner is in a higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse or common-law partner1. The tax savings depend on the difference between the marginal tax rates of the spouses or common-law partners1. The other statements are incorrect. Minu will not be exposed to a pension adjustment (PA) if she receives income from Saheed’s pension. A PA is a measure of the value of benefits accrued in a registered pension plan or deferred profit sharing plan during a calendar year2. It reduces the RRSP contribution room of the plan member, not the spouse or common-law partner who receives part of their pension income2. Pension income splitting is not a form of tax evasion and is not illegal based on income tax legislation. It is a legitimate way to reduce taxable income and taxes payable by shifting income from a higher-income spouse or common-law partner to a lower-income spouse or common-law partner1. Pension income splitting may change the total amount of income taxes paid by the couple, depending on their marginal tax rates. If the transferring spouse or common-law partner is in a higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse or common-law partner, pension income splitting may lower their combined taxes payable1. However, if they are in the same tax bracket, pension income splitting may not have any effect on their taxes payable1. References: Pension income splitting, Pension adjustment